Suppr超能文献

常规与主动机器人辅助全膝关节置换术时间比较。

Comparison of Time Taken in Conventional versus Active Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, CritiCare Asia Hospital, Mumbai, India.

Department of Orthopedics, Holy Spirit Hospital, Mumbai, India.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Surg. 2024 Apr;16(2):259-264. doi: 10.4055/cios23062. Epub 2024 Feb 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Computer- and robotic-assisted total knee replacement procedures have been shown to improve the accuracy of the implant size. It also allows dynamic confirmation of the implant and limb alignment during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The major inhibition of the arthroplasty surgeon in adapting to the robotic-assisted TKA (RA-TKA) is the extra time spent during the registration process and milling of the bone with the robot. The aim of the study was to ascertain the extra time spent during these 2 steps as compared to the conventional TKA (C-TKA).

METHODS

It is a prospective study involving 30 patients each in the conventional TKA and RA-TKA operated by the same surgical team. The patients were given a choice between the C-TKA and RA-TKA and consecutive 30 cases in each group were studied by an independent observer. In the C-TKA group, the time for the application of appropriate zigs and execution of the bone cuts and soft-tissue release was recorded whereas in the RA-TKA group, the time taken for fixation of the tibial and femoral arrays and bone registration and bone milling with robot and required soft-tissue release was measured.

RESULTS

The preoperative patient characteristics were the same in both groups. The time taken in the C-TKA and RA-TKA groups was 24.77 ± 1.92 minutes and 25.03 ± 3.27 minutes, respectively, which is statistically insignificant ( = 0.709).

CONCLUSIONS

The study findings show that RA-TKA does not take additional time than C-TKA.

摘要

背景

计算机辅助和机器人辅助全膝关节置换术已被证明可以提高植入物尺寸的准确性。它还允许在全膝关节置换术(TKA)期间动态确认植入物和肢体的对线。关节置换外科医生在适应机器人辅助 TKA(RA-TKA)方面的主要抑制因素是在注册过程中和机器人铣削骨骼时花费的额外时间。本研究的目的是确定与传统 TKA(C-TKA)相比,这两个步骤所花费的额外时间。

方法

这是一项前瞻性研究,由同一手术团队对 30 例患者分别进行传统 TKA 和 RA-TKA 手术。患者可以在 C-TKA 和 RA-TKA 之间进行选择,每组连续 30 例病例由独立观察者进行研究。在 C-TKA 组中,记录了应用适当 Zig 和执行骨切割和软组织松解的时间,而在 RA-TKA 组中,测量了固定胫骨和股骨阵列以及用机器人进行骨骼注册和骨骼铣削以及所需软组织松解所花费的时间。

结果

两组患者的术前特征相同。C-TKA 和 RA-TKA 组的手术时间分别为 24.77±1.92 分钟和 25.03±3.27 分钟,差异无统计学意义(=0.709)。

结论

研究结果表明,RA-TKA 不会比 C-TKA 花费额外的时间。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Time Taken in Conventional versus Active Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Clin Orthop Surg. 2024 Apr;16(2):259-264. doi: 10.4055/cios23062. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
3
Learning curve analysis of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty with a Chinese surgical system.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Nov 27;18(1):900. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04382-4.
4
Robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty improves preoperative planning and intraoperative decision-making.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Nov 15;16(1):670. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02815-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Current Narrative Review-Application of Blood Flow Restriction Exercise in Clinical Knee Problems.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jul 30;61(8):1377. doi: 10.3390/medicina61081377.
2
The role of next-generation robotic systems in transforming knee arthroplasty: precision and beyond.
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jul 15;19(1):393. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02560-6.
3
Reproducibility of a new device for robotic-assisted TKA surgery.
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Feb 18;12(1):e70153. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70153. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
Evaluating surgical outcomes: robotic-assisted vs. conventional total knee arthroplasty.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Feb 15;20(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05518-4.
5
The 100 most cited articles in artificial intelligence related to orthopedics.
Front Surg. 2024 Apr 17;11:1370335. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1370335. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

2
Learning curve for active robotic total knee arthroplasty.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Aug;30(8):2666-2676. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06452-8. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
3
Learning Curve for the Direct Superior Approach to Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Orthopedics. 2020 Jul 1;43(4):e237-e243. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20200404-05. Epub 2020 Apr 12.
5
Robotic-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: State-of-the Art and Review of the Literature.
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jul;33(7):1994-2001. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.01.050. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
6
Three groups of dissatisfied patients exist after total knee arthroplasty: early, persistent, and late.
Bone Joint J. 2018 Feb;100-B(2):161-169. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B2.BJJ-2017-1016.R1.
7
Technology-Assisted Hip and Knee Arthroplasties: An Analysis of Utilization Trends.
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Apr;33(4):1019-1023. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.033. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
8
Coronal Correction for Severe Deformity Using Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty.
J Knee Surg. 2018 Jan;31(1):2-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1608840. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
9
The Learning Curve Associated with Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty.
J Knee Surg. 2018 Jan;31(1):17-21. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1608809. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
10
Difficult Cases in Robotic Arm-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Case Series.
J Knee Surg. 2018 Jan;31(1):27-37. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1608839. Epub 2017 Nov 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验