Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
NY Cancer and Blood Specialists, New York, New York, USA.
Oncologist. 2020 Jun;25(6):e993-e997. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0040. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
Atypical response patterns following immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) led to the concept of continuation of treatment beyond progression (TBP); however, the longitudinal benefit of this approach is unclear. We therefore performed a retrospective analysis of 64 patients treated with ICB; 20 who received TBP (TBP cohort) and 44 who stopped ICB at initial progression (non-TBP cohort). The TBP cohort received ICB for a median of 4.7 months after initial progression and delayed subsequent treatment by a median of 6.6 months. Despite receiving more prior lines of therapy, the TBP cohort achieved longer progression-free survival with post-ICB treatment (median, 17.5 months vs. 6.1 months, p = .035) and longer time-to-subsequent treatment failure, defined as time from initial ICB progression to failure of subsequent treatment (median, 34.6 months vs. 9.9 months, p = .003). With the limitations of a retrospective study, these results support the clinical benefit of TBP with ICB for selected patients.
霍奇金淋巴瘤(HL)患者在接受免疫检查点抑制剂(ICB)治疗后出现非典型反应模式,由此产生了在疾病进展后继续治疗(TBP)的概念;然而,这种方法的长期获益尚不清楚。因此,我们对 64 例接受 ICB 治疗的患者进行了回顾性分析;其中 20 例患者接受了 TBP(TBP 组),44 例患者在首次进展时停止 ICB(非 TBP 组)。TBP 组在初始进展后接受 ICB 治疗的中位数为 4.7 个月,并且随后的治疗延迟中位数为 6.6 个月。尽管接受了更多的前期治疗,但 TBP 组在接受 ICB 治疗后获得了更长的无进展生存期(中位数为 17.5 个月 vs. 6.1 个月,p=0.035)和更长的后续治疗失败时间,定义为从初始 ICB 进展到后续治疗失败的时间(中位数为 34.6 个月 vs. 9.9 个月,p=0.003)。鉴于这是一项回顾性研究,这些结果支持在选定患者中,TBP 联合 ICB 具有临床获益。