Morris Mackenzie C, Niziolek Grace M, Baker Jennifer E, Huebner Benjamin R, Hanseman Dennis, Makley Amy T, Pritts Timothy A, Goodman Michael D
Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
J Surg Res. 2020 Aug;252:139-146. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.03.004. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
Age and massive transfusion are predictors of mortality after trauma. We hypothesized that increasing age and high-volume transfusion would result in progressively elevated mortality rates and that a transfusion "ceiling" would define futility.
The Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database was queried for 2013-2016 records and our level I trauma registry was reviewed from 2013 to 2018. Demographic, mortality, and blood transfusion data were collected. Patients were grouped by decade of life and by packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusion requirement (zero units, 1-3 units, or ≥4 units) within 4 h of admission.
TQIP analysis demonstrated an in-hospital mortality risk that increased linearly with age, to an odds ratio of 10.1 in ≥80 y old (P < 0.01). Mortality rates were significantly higher in older adults (P < 0.01) and those with more pRBCs transfused. In massively transfused patients, the transfusion "ceiling" was dependent on age. Owing to the lack granularity in the TQIP database, 230 patients from our institution who received ≥4 units of pRBCs within 4 h of admission were reviewed. On arrival, younger patients had significantly higher heart rates and more severe derangements in lactate levels, base deficits, and pH compared with older patients. There were no differences among age groups in injury severity score, systolic blood pressure, or mortality.
In massively transfused patients, mortality increased with age. However, a significant proportion of older adults were successfully resuscitated. Therefore, age alone should not be considered a contraindication to high-volume transfusion. Traditional physiologic and laboratory criteria indicative of hemorrhagic shock may have reduced reliability with increasing age, and thus providers must have a heightened suspicion for hemorrhage in the elderly. Early transfusion requirements can be combined with age to establish prognosis to define futility to help counsel families regarding mortality after traumatic injury.
年龄和大量输血是创伤后死亡率的预测因素。我们假设,年龄增长和大量输血会导致死亡率逐渐升高,并且输血“上限”可以界定治疗的无意义性。
查询创伤质量改进计划(TQIP)数据库中2013 - 2016年的记录,并回顾我们机构2013年至2018年的一级创伤登记资料。收集人口统计学、死亡率和输血数据。患者按年龄十年分组,并按入院后4小时内红细胞悬液(pRBC)的输血需求量(0单位、1 - 3单位或≥4单位)分组。
TQIP分析显示,住院死亡率风险随年龄呈线性增加,80岁及以上患者的比值比为10.1(P < 0.01)。老年人(P < 0.01)和输注更多pRBC的患者死亡率显著更高。在大量输血的患者中,输血“上限”取决于年龄。由于TQIP数据库缺乏细节,对我们机构230例入院后4小时内接受≥4单位pRBC的患者进行了回顾。入院时,年轻患者的心率显著更高,乳酸水平、碱缺失和pH值的紊乱比老年患者更严重。各年龄组在损伤严重程度评分、收缩压或死亡率方面无差异。
在大量输血的患者中,死亡率随年龄增加。然而,相当一部分老年人成功复苏。因此,不应仅将年龄视为大量输血的禁忌证。随着年龄增长,指示失血性休克的传统生理和实验室标准的可靠性可能会降低,因此医疗人员必须对老年人出血保持更高的警惕性。早期输血需求可与年龄相结合来确定预后,界定治疗的无意义性,以帮助向家属提供有关创伤后死亡率的咨询。