Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, Chungnam National University, Daejon, South Korea.
Assistant Professor, Department of Social Welfare, Gachon University, Seongnam-si, South Korea.
J Aging Soc Policy. 2021 Nov-Dec;33(6):571-584. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2020.1750540. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
Ageism, socially constructed discrimination against seniors, influences the quality of life of older adults. This study aimed to compare ageism in 15 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries using the scientifically developed Comparative Macro-Level Ageism Index (CMAI). We developed the CMAI by reviewing previous index research on the life of older people and conducting expert interviews using a Delphi method. We identified five domains, economic status, health, employment, environment, and social participation, and 17 indicators of ageism. Standardized ageism scores were compared across 15 OECD countries. The results indicated that the overall ageism score was highest in Turkey and lowest in Japan. Turkey was the most likely while South Korea was the least likely to practice age discrimination in the workplace. Yet, South Korea had the highest score for discriminating against seniors based on economic status while Spain had the lowest score in this domain. Japan had favorable conditions for economic status, health status, and social participation for older adults. Implications of this study and suggestions for further studies on developing an objective indicator of structural age discrimination are discussed.
年龄歧视,即社会上对老年人的歧视,影响老年人的生活质量。本研究旨在使用科学制定的比较宏观层面年龄歧视指数(CMAI)比较 15 个经济合作与发展组织(OECD)国家的年龄歧视情况。我们通过回顾先前关于老年人生活的指数研究,并使用德尔菲法进行专家访谈,制定了 CMAI。我们确定了五个领域,即经济状况、健康、就业、环境和社会参与,以及 17 个年龄歧视指标。我们比较了 15 个 OECD 国家的标准化年龄歧视得分。结果表明,土耳其的总体年龄歧视得分最高,日本最低。土耳其最有可能在工作场所实行年龄歧视,而韩国最不可能。然而,韩国在基于经济地位歧视老年人方面得分最高,而西班牙在这一领域得分最低。日本为老年人提供了有利的经济地位、健康状况和社会参与条件。本文讨论了这一研究的意义以及进一步研究制定结构性年龄歧视客观指标的建议。