Suppr超能文献

肝细胞癌肝移植患者的复发模式和生存分析的单中心经验

Single-Center Experience of Recurrence Patterns and Survival Analyses of Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Liver Transplant.

机构信息

>From the Department of Medical Oncology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Exp Clin Transplant. 2020 Apr;18(2):201-205. doi: 10.6002/ect.2020.0046.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Hepatocellular carcinoma remains a major health problem with increased rates of mortality. The curative treatment options are resection or liver transplant. Because the Milan criteria are restrictive for candidates, they have been expanded into alternative sets of criteria. We aimed to evaluate our indications for liver transplant and their results for hepatocellular carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between December 1988 and January 2020, we performed 652 liver transplant procedures (443 living donors, 209 deceased donors) at Baskent University (Ankara, Turkey). At Baskent University, we developed liver transplant criteria for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. For our criteria, liver transplant for hepatocellular carcinoma was performed in patients without major vascular invasion and distant metastasis. Clinical data on cancer demographics, recurrence patterns, and survival outcomes were evaluated retrospectively.

RESULTS

Of 652 total patients, 49 adult patients (8%) with diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma were included in this study. Median age was 55 years. Hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplant was detected in 13 patients. Median overall survival was 64.3 months for all study patients; however, median survival was significantly lower in patients who had recurrence (126.3 vs 43.4 mo for nonrecurrent vs recurrent groups; P = .024). In the expanded criteria group (n = 25), 7 patients (28%) had hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence during follow-up, whereas this ratio was 25% (6/24 patients) in the Milan criteria group, with median time to recurrence of 12.6 versus 11.7 months, respectively (not significantly different).

CONCLUSIONS

Multidisciplinary treatment modalities, including surgery, interventional radiology techniques, and medical treatments, will probably lead to prolonged survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. According to our center's expanded criteria, recurrence rates and time to recurrence were similar to those shown with the Milan group. We showed that Milan criteria can be safely expanded with promising results even in patients beyond Milan criteria.

摘要

目的

肝细胞癌仍是一个死亡率不断上升的主要健康问题。根治性治疗方法是肝切除术或肝移植。由于米兰标准对候选者限制较多,因此已将其扩展为替代标准集。我们旨在评估我们对肝移植的适应证及其对肝细胞癌的结果。

材料和方法

1988 年 12 月至 2020 年 1 月,我们在 Baskent 大学(土耳其安卡拉)进行了 652 例肝移植手术(443 例活体供者,209 例已故供者)。在 Baskent 大学,我们为患有肝细胞癌的患者制定了肝移植标准。对于我们的标准,对于没有主要血管侵犯和远处转移的肝细胞癌患者进行肝移植。回顾性评估了癌症人口统计学、复发模式和生存结果的临床数据。

结果

在 652 例患者中,有 49 例成年患者(8%)被诊断为肝细胞癌,包括在本研究中。中位年龄为 55 岁。肝移植后,13 例患者检测到肝细胞癌复发。所有研究患者的中位总生存期为 64.3 个月;然而,在有复发的患者中,中位生存时间明显较低(无复发组为 126.3 个月,复发组为 43.4 个月;P =.024)。在扩展标准组(n = 25)中,7 例(28%)患者在随访期间发生肝细胞癌复发,而在米兰标准组中,这一比例为 25%(24 例患者中有 6 例),中位复发时间分别为 12.6 个月和 11.7 个月,差异无统计学意义。

结论

包括手术、介入放射学技术和药物治疗在内的多学科治疗方法可能会延长肝细胞癌患者的生存时间。根据我们中心的扩展标准,复发率和复发时间与米兰组相似。我们表明,即使在超出米兰标准的患者中,米兰标准也可以安全扩展,结果有希望。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验