Suppr超能文献

清除还是不清除。

To Purge or Not to Purge.

作者信息

Hugo Juan D V, Yeung Alexander, Weerwind Patrick W

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; and.

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht-CARIM, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Extra Corpor Technol. 2020 Mar;52(1):22-26. doi: 10.1182/ject-1900022.

Abstract

To remove gaseous microemboli (GME) using an oxygenator with an integrated arterial filter, it is recommended by some manufacturers to purge the oxygenator as an additional safety feature while on bypass. In this in vitro study, we evaluated whether purging of oxygenators with an integrated arterial filter is efficient in reducing GME. Five different types of commercially available contemporary oxygenators with an integrated arterial filter based on progressive filter filtration (1), cascade filtration (1), screen filtration (2), or self-venting (1) were tested for their efficiency in removing GME while keeping the purge line open or closed. A bubble counter was used for pre- and post-oxygenator GME signaling, from which the filter efficiency was computed. Freshly drawn heparinized porcine blood was used at blood flow rates of 3 and 5 L/min. Three units of each oxygenator were tested with its specific reservoir at a fixed volume level of 1,500 mL. GME load was introduced into the venous line at 1,000 mL air/min. Measurements started as soon as GME were detected by the pre-oxygenator probe and then continued for 1 minute. There was no statistically significant difference in filter efficiency between the purged and non-purged groups for specific oxygenators. At a blood flow of 3 L/min, the average filter efficiency stayed approximately invariable when comparing the non-purged and purged groups, where 89.1-88.2% indicated the largest difference between the groups. At a blood flow rate of 5 L/min, the filter efficiency changed in one screen filter group from an average of 55.7% in the non-purged group to 42.4% in the purged group. Other filter efficiencies at the blood flow rate of 5 L/min for non-purged compared with purged groups were, respectively, 98.0 vs. 98.0% (screen filtration), 88.6 vs. 85.8% (self-venting filtration), 82.8 vs. 75.5% (progressive filter filtration), and 65.4 vs. 65.1% (cascade filtration). Based on these results, purging while confronted with continuous GME challenge did not result in an increased filter efficiency.

摘要

为了使用带有集成动脉过滤器的氧合器去除气态微栓子(GME),一些制造商建议在体外循环期间对氧合器进行冲洗,作为一项额外的安全措施。在这项体外研究中,我们评估了对带有集成动脉过滤器的氧合器进行冲洗在减少GME方面是否有效。测试了五种基于渐进式过滤(1种)、级联过滤(1种)、筛网过滤(2种)或自排气(1种)的市售当代集成动脉过滤器的不同类型氧合器在保持冲洗管路打开或关闭时去除GME的效率。使用气泡计数器对氧合器前后的GME信号进行检测,并据此计算过滤器效率。使用新鲜采集的肝素化猪血,血流速度分别为3升/分钟和5升/分钟。每种氧合器的三个单元在固定容积为1500毫升的特定储液器中进行测试。以1000毫升空气/分钟的速度将GME负荷引入静脉管路。一旦预氧合器探头检测到GME,测量立即开始,然后持续进行一分钟。对于特定的氧合器,冲洗组和未冲洗组之间的过滤器效率没有统计学上的显著差异。在血流速度为3升/分钟时,比较未冲洗组和冲洗组,平均过滤器效率大致保持不变,两组之间最大差异为89.1%-88.2%。在血流速度为5升/分钟时,一个筛网过滤组的过滤器效率从未冲洗组的平均55.7%变为冲洗组的42.4%。在血流速度为5升/分钟时,未冲洗组与冲洗组相比,其他过滤器效率分别为:筛网过滤98.0%对98.0%,自排气过滤88.6%对85.8%,渐进式过滤82.8%对75.5%,级联过滤65.4%对65.1%。基于这些结果,在面对持续的GME挑战时进行冲洗并不会提高过滤器效率。

相似文献

1
To Purge or Not to Purge.
J Extra Corpor Technol. 2020 Mar;52(1):22-26. doi: 10.1182/ject-1900022.
3
Can the oxygenator screen filter reduce gaseous microemboli?
J Extra Corpor Technol. 2014 Mar;46(1):60-6.
6
Evaluation of the Quadrox-I neonatal oxygenator with an integrated arterial filter.
Perfusion. 2010 Nov;25(6):409-15. doi: 10.1177/0267659110380773. Epub 2010 Aug 10.

本文引用的文献

2
3
Can the oxygenator screen filter reduce gaseous microemboli?
J Extra Corpor Technol. 2014 Mar;46(1):60-6.
6
Evidence-based used, yet still controversial: the arterial filter.
J Extra Corpor Technol. 2012 Mar;44(1):P27-30.
8
Brain protection during pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass.
Artif Organs. 2010 Apr;34(4):E91-102. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2009.00963.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验