Suppr超能文献

连续性操作的埃塞克斯-洛普雷斯蒂损伤:一项回顾性队列研究的长期结果

The Serially-Operated Essex-Lopresti Injury: Long-Term Outcomes in a Retrospective Cohort.

作者信息

Verhiel Svenna H W L, Özkan Sezai, Langhammer Christopher G, Chen Neal C

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.

出版信息

J Hand Microsurg. 2020 Apr;12(1):47-55. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3401380. Epub 2020 Jan 16.

Abstract

The main aim of this article is to report 10-year outcomes after Essex-Lopresti injury (ELI).  Retrospective case series. Two level I trauma centers and one associated community hospital from 2003 to 2016.  Sixteen patients who sustained an ELI and were treated at one of our three regional hospitals.  Initially, 4 patients (25%) were treated nonoperatively by immobilization and 12 patients (75%) were treated operatively. Proximal surgery included radial head open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), radial head arthroplasty, radial head excision and forearm ORIF, and wound debridement. Ten patients (63%) were acutely identified with longitudinal forearm instability. Of these, four patients had the distal radioulnar joint pinned. In the other six patients, the forearm was immobilized. Overall, 16 patients underwent a total of 32 revision surgeries.  Performance of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity (PROMIS UE) Physical score, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score for pain-severity, and NRS score for satisfaction of overall outcome.  Follow-up for outcome evaluation was available for 10 patients, at a median of 10 (interquartile range [IQR]: 8.0-12) years after date of injury. The median PROMIS UE Physical score was 36 (IQR: 33-38). Median NRS score for pain-severity on average was 5 (IQR: 0-6). The median NRS score for satisfaction of overall outcome was 7 (IQR: 5-8).  Patients who sustain an ELI generally have substantial deficits of upper extremity function as measured by PROMIS UE. Early radial head arthroplasty may be beneficial, but further study in a larger cohort is needed. Outcomes of nonoperative treatment and operative treatment were similar and suggest that current surgical treatments are incomplete.

摘要

本文的主要目的是报告埃塞克斯-洛普雷蒂损伤(ELI)后的10年预后情况。 回顾性病例系列研究。研究对象来自2003年至2016年期间的两家一级创伤中心和一家相关社区医院。 16例发生ELI并在我们三家区域医院之一接受治疗的患者。 最初,4例患者(25%)通过制动进行非手术治疗,12例患者(75%)接受手术治疗。近端手术包括桡骨头切开复位内固定(ORIF)、桡骨头置换术、桡骨头切除术和前臂ORIF以及伤口清创术。10例患者(63%)被急性诊断为前臂纵向不稳定。其中,4例患者的下尺桡关节进行了固定。在另外6例患者中,前臂进行了制动。总体而言,16例患者共接受了32次翻修手术。 采用患者报告结局测量信息系统上肢(PROMIS UE)身体评分、疼痛严重程度数字评定量表(NRS)评分和总体结局满意度NRS评分。 10例患者可进行结局评估随访,自受伤之日起中位随访时间为10年(四分位间距[IQR]:8.0 - 12年)。PROMIS UE身体评分的中位数为36(IQR:33 - 38)。疼痛严重程度的NRS评分中位数平均为5(IQR:0 - 6)。总体结局满意度的NRS评分中位数为7(IQR:5 - 8)。 发生ELI的患者,根据PROMIS UE测量,上肢功能通常存在明显缺陷。早期桡骨头置换术可能有益,但需要在更大队列中进行进一步研究。非手术治疗和手术治疗的结局相似,表明目前的手术治疗并不完善。

相似文献

4
The treatment of the acute Essex-Lopresti injury.急性埃塞克斯-洛普雷斯蒂损伤的治疗
Bone Joint J. 2014 Oct;96-B(10):1385-91. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B10.33334.
9
[Characteristics and treatments of the Essex-Lopresti injury].[埃塞克斯-洛普雷斯蒂损伤的特征与治疗]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2017 Jan 25;30(1):47-50. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2017.01.011.

本文引用的文献

5
Management of the Essex-Lopresti Injury.埃塞克斯-洛普雷斯蒂损伤的治疗
J Wrist Surg. 2016 Aug;5(3):172-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1584544. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
7
The treatment of the acute Essex-Lopresti injury.急性埃塞克斯-洛普雷斯蒂损伤的治疗
Bone Joint J. 2014 Oct;96-B(10):1385-91. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B10.33334.
9
Chronic Essex-Lopresti injuries: an alternative treatment method.慢性 Essex-Lopresti 损伤:一种替代治疗方法。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Jun;23(6):861-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.01.043. Epub 2014 Apr 22.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验