Liporoni Priscila Christiane Suzy, Wan Bakar Wan Zaripah, Zanatta Rayssa Ferreira, Ambrosano Glaucia Maria, Aguiar Flávio Henrique Baggio, Amaechi Bennett T
Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Taubaté, Taubaté, SP, Brazil.
Department of Comprehensive Dentistry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2020 Apr 1;12:101-109. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S234716. eCollection 2020.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of erosive/abrasive cycles and two different levels of abrasiveness of dentifrices over enamel and dentin subjected to bleaching.
Enamel and dentin bovine specimens were prepared and submitted to an at-home bleaching treatment using 9.5% hydrogen peroxide gel, which was applied daily (30 min/14 days). Concomitant with bleaching, an erosive cycle was performed using citric acid (0.3%, pH 3.8, 5 mins, 3×/day), followed by immersions in artificial saliva for remineralization (30 mins). Abrasion was done with two (high and low abrasiveness) dentifrices (2×/day, 120 seconds) after the first and third erosive immersion each day. Enamel and dentin softening were assessed by microhardness and erosive tooth wear by optical profilometry. Data were submitted to repeated measures ANOVA, followed by the Tukey's test with a significance level of 5%.
For the enamel and considering the erosive-abrasive cycle, significant differences were found between the groups tested, the bleaching, and the abrasiveness of the dentifrice tested; however, the final microhardness values were significantly lower than the initial ones. For dentin, differences were found between the eroded/abrasion and the non-eroded/abrasion groups, with the former presenting lower microhardness values compared with the latter. In addition, bleaching decreased the microhardness values only for the highly abrasive dentifrice, and the final values were lower than for the initial ones for all tested groups.
The use of high and low abrasiveness dentifrices during bleaching and concomitant with erosion/abrasion cycles is more harmful to dentin than to enamel.
Although bleaching is considered a conservative treatment, it can cause deleterious effects to dental hard tissue. The association of an at-home bleaching technique with erosion and high- or low- abrasive dentifrices harms dentin more than enamel.
本研究的目的是评估侵蚀/磨损循环以及两种不同磨损性的牙膏对经过漂白处理的牙釉质和牙本质的影响。
制备牛牙釉质和牙本质标本,使用9.5%过氧化氢凝胶进行家庭漂白处理,每天使用(30分钟/14天)。在漂白的同时,使用柠檬酸(0.3%,pH 3.8,5分钟,每天3次)进行侵蚀循环,然后浸泡在人工唾液中进行再矿化(30分钟)。每天在第一次和第三次侵蚀浸泡后,使用两种(高磨损性和低磨损性)牙膏进行刷牙(每天2次,120秒)。通过显微硬度评估牙釉质和牙本质的软化情况,通过光学轮廓仪评估侵蚀性牙齿磨损情况。数据进行重复测量方差分析,然后进行Tukey检验,显著性水平为5%。
对于牙釉质,考虑到侵蚀-磨损循环,在测试组、漂白处理和测试牙膏的磨损性之间发现了显著差异;然而,最终的显微硬度值显著低于初始值。对于牙本质,在侵蚀/磨损组和未侵蚀/未磨损组之间发现了差异,前者的显微硬度值低于后者。此外,漂白仅降低了高磨损性牙膏组的显微硬度值,所有测试组的最终值均低于初始值。
在漂白过程中以及与侵蚀/磨损循环同时使用高磨损性和低磨损性牙膏对牙本质的危害比对牙釉质的危害更大。
尽管漂白被认为是一种保守治疗,但它可能对牙齿硬组织造成有害影响。家庭漂白技术与侵蚀以及高或低磨损性牙膏的联合使用对牙本质的危害大于对牙釉质的危害。