Salgado Benjamin C, Bhimaraj Arvind
HOUSTON METHODIST DEBAKEY HEART & VASCULAR CENTER, HOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL, HOUSTON, TEXAS.
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2020 Jan-Mar;16(1):43-49. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-16-1-43.
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a complex syndrome of end-organ hypoperfusion that requires timely and thorough decision making. While many pathophysiologic and technical principles have been delineated in this issue, the purpose of this case-based report is to reflect upon some of these principles in the context of real-life scenarios. Given the obvious lacuna of evidence-based recommendations in CS, the authors provide a rationale for their decision-making process. The first case is a young post-heart-transplant patient with graft failure who was in a state of biventricular failure and restrictive physiology and required acute mechanical circulatory support (MCS). The second case is a patient who suffered a mechanical complication after experiencing an acute myocardial infarction that required MCS.
心源性休克(CS)是一种终末器官灌注不足的复杂综合征,需要及时且全面的决策。虽然本期已经阐述了许多病理生理和技术原理,但本病例报告的目的是在现实场景中对其中一些原理进行反思。鉴于CS缺乏基于证据的推荐意见,作者提供了他们决策过程的基本原理。第一个病例是一名年轻的心脏移植后患者,移植失败,处于双心室衰竭和限制性生理学状态,需要急性机械循环支持(MCS)。第二个病例是一名急性心肌梗死后发生机械并发症且需要MCS的患者。