Hilvert Elizabeth, Hoover Jill, Sterling Audra, Schroeder Susen
Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Department of Communication Disorders, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Apr 27;63(4):1181-1194. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00022. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
Purpose This study compared and characterized the tense and agreement productivity of boys with fragile X syndrome (FXS), children with developmental language disorder (DLD), and children with typical development (TD) matched on mean length of utterance. Method Twenty-two boys with FXS ( = 12.22 years), 19 children with DLD ( = 4.81 years), and 20 children with TD ( = 3.23 years) produced language samples that were coded for their productive use of five tense markers (i.e., third-person singular, past tense , copula , auxiliary , and auxiliary ) using the tense and agreement productivity score. Children also completed norm-referenced cognitive and linguistic assessments. Results Children with DLD generally used tense and agreement markers less productively than children with TD, particularly third-person singular and auxiliary . However, boys with FXS demonstrated a more complicated pattern of productivity, where they were similar to children with DLD and TD, depending on the tense marker examined. Results revealed that children with DLD and TD showed a specific developmental sequence of the individual tense markers that aligns with patterns documented by previous studies, whereas boys with FXS demonstrated a more even profile of productivity. Conclusions These findings help to further clarify areas of overlap and discrepancy in tense and agreement productivity among boys with FXS and children with DLD. Additional clinical implications of these results are discussed.
目的 本研究比较并描述了脆性X综合征(FXS)男孩、发育性语言障碍(DLD)儿童和按平均语句长度匹配的发育正常(TD)儿童在时态和一致性方面的产出能力。方法 22名FXS男孩(平均年龄 = 12.22岁)、19名DLD儿童(平均年龄 = 4.81岁)和20名TD儿童(平均年龄 = 3.23岁)产出语言样本,使用时态和一致性产出分数对其使用五个时态标记(即第三人称单数、过去式、系动词、助动词和助动词)的产出情况进行编码。儿童还完成了常模参照的认知和语言评估。结果 DLD儿童在使用时态和一致性标记方面的产出能力通常低于TD儿童,尤其是第三人称单数和助动词。然而,FXS男孩表现出更复杂的产出模式,根据所检查的时态标记,他们与DLD儿童和TD儿童的情况有所不同。结果显示,DLD儿童和TD儿童表现出个体时态标记的特定发展顺序,这与先前研究记录的模式一致,而FXS男孩的产出能力分布更为均匀。结论 这些发现有助于进一步阐明FXS男孩和DLD儿童在时态和一致性产出方面的重叠和差异领域。讨论了这些结果的其他临床意义。