Department of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 Aug;16(8):e758-e769. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00633. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
Routine use of extended-fraction (> 10 fractions) radiation therapy (RT) for palliation of bone metastases is recognized as a low-value intervention by the American Society for Radiation Oncology. We examined contemporary practice patterns of, and physician characteristics associated with extended-fraction RT use.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Medicare fee-for-service data. We included patients who underwent 2- or 3-dimensional external-beam RT for bone metastases between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018. Physicians treating > 10 patients over the study period were analyzed for their individual practice. Hierarchic logistic regression modeling was used to identify patient- and physician-level factors associated with extended-fraction RT use.
A total of 12,221 patients (median age, 75.6 years; 40.9% women, 87.6% white) were included. The rate of extended-fraction RT was 23.4%. A total of 1,432 physicians treated any patient. Among the 382 physicians treating > 10 patients, 127 (33.2%) used extended-fraction RT > 30% (consensus threshold). Physician factors associated with decreased odds of extended-fraction RT were years since medical school graduation (≤ 10 years and 11-20 years ≥ 31 years: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.32 [95% CI, 0.20 to 0.51] and 0.64 [95% CI, 0.44 to 0.93]) and practicing in the Northeast or Midwest versus the South (aOR, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.22 to 0.58] and 0.48 [95% CI, 0.31 to 0.74]). Physicians treating > 20 patients ( 11-14 patients) over the study period had increased odds of delivering extended-fraction RT (aOR, 1.53 [95% CI, 1.10 to 2.12]).
In this study, almost one fourth of patients received extended-fraction RT, and one third of physicians had an extended-fraction RT use rate of > 30%. Personalized feedback of performance data, clinical pathways and peer review, and updated reimbursement models are potential mechanisms to address this low-value care.
美国放射肿瘤学会已将缓解骨转移的扩展分割(> 10 次分割)放射治疗(RT)作为低价值干预措施。我们研究了扩展分割 RT 使用的当代实践模式和与医生特征相关的因素。
我们使用医疗保险按服务收费数据进行了回顾性队列研究。我们纳入了 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日期间接受 2 维和 3 维外照射 RT 治疗骨转移的患者。对在研究期间治疗超过 10 名患者的医生进行了个人实践分析。使用层次逻辑回归模型确定与扩展分割 RT 使用相关的患者和医生水平因素。
共纳入 12221 名患者(中位年龄为 75.6 岁;40.9%为女性,87.6%为白人)。扩展分割 RT 的比例为 23.4%。共有 1432 名医生治疗了任何患者。在治疗超过 10 名患者的 382 名医生中,有 127 名(33.2%)使用扩展分割 RT 超过 30%(共识阈值)。与扩展分割 RT 使用可能性降低相关的医生因素包括医学院毕业后年限(≤ 10 年和 11-20 年≥31 年:调整后的优势比 [aOR],0.32 [95%CI,0.20 至 0.51] 和 0.64 [95%CI,0.44 至 0.93])和在东北地区或中西部地区行医而不是在南部地区行医(aOR,0.36 [95%CI,0.22 至 0.58] 和 0.48 [95%CI,0.31 至 0.74])。在研究期间治疗超过 20 名患者(11-14 名)的医生使用扩展分割 RT 的可能性增加(aOR,1.53 [95%CI,1.10 至 2.12])。
在这项研究中,近四分之一的患者接受了扩展分割 RT,三分之一的医生的扩展分割 RT 使用率超过 30%。个性化反馈绩效数据、临床路径和同行评审以及更新的报销模式是解决这种低价值护理的潜在机制。