Suppr超能文献

基于重力线和椎体斜率评估矢状位脊柱排列:不同 Roussouly 曲线分析。

Characterization of Sagittal Spine Alignment With Reference to the Gravity Line and Vertebral Slopes: An Analysis of Different Roussouly Curves.

机构信息

University Orthopaedics, Hand and Reconstructive Microsurgery (UOHC), National University Health System, Singapore.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 May 1;45(9):E481-E488. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003379.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

MINI: Spinal sagittal realignment necessitates a reference posture, and thus far this has only been defined for an "averaged" curve via horizontal offsets from the gravity line (GL). This prospective study of 169 healthy subjects demonstrates normative sagittal spatial orientation of each vertebra, for all Roussouly curve types, using vertebral slopes and horizontal offsets from the GL.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To map the healthy standing alignment of the adult spine, grouped according to Roussouly curve types, using both horizontal offset distance from the gravity line (GL), as well as vertebral slope measurements.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Spinal sagittal realignment requires a reference posture, and this has been defined in the literature via horizontal offsets from the GL. While useful, this does not provide information on the orientation of each vertebral segment, or distinguish between the various physiological curve types.

METHODS

A total of 169 consecutive young adult subjects with healthy spines were recruited over a year. (EOS Imaging, Paris, France) whole body radiographs were performed. Radiographic measurements collected included sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1-slope, global cervical angle (GCA), global thoracic angle (GTA), global lumbar angle (GLA), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), apical and inflection vertebrae. Outcome measures comprised slope measurements, and distance offsets relative to the GL for individual vertebrae from T3 to S1.

RESULTS

GLA, PI, PT, SS, apex of lordosis, and inflection vertebra were significantly different across groups, while SVA, T1-slope, GCA, GTA, and apex of kyphosis were not. Mean PI to LL discrepancy for Type I to IV groups were 8.0°, 2.3°, 4.8°, and 3.0°, respectively. Between groups, T3, T7 to T12, and L2 to S1 slopes and T9 to L3 offset distances from GL were significantly different, while the distance of the hip center from the GL was not. GLA was significantly different between curve types except between Type 1 and 2 curves, while the inflection vertebrae were not significantly different between Type 1 and 2 curves, as well as Type 3 and 4 curves.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates normative sagittal spatial orientation of each vertebra in healthy adults, for each Roussouly type. Comparison across groups suggests the possibility of further refining the sagittal curve patterns described by Roussouly.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

摘要

未加标签

MINI:脊柱矢状面重新排列需要参考姿势,到目前为止,这仅通过从重力线(GL)的水平偏移来定义为“平均”曲线。这项针对 169 名健康受试者的前瞻性研究使用椎骨斜率和从 GL 的水平偏移,展示了所有 Roussouly 曲线类型的每个椎骨的正常矢状空间定向。

研究设计

前瞻性研究。

目的

使用从 GL 的水平偏移距离(GL)以及椎骨斜率测量值,根据 Roussouly 曲线类型对成人脊柱的健康站立位置进行分组,从而对健康成人脊柱的正常矢状面空间定位进行分组。

背景资料总结

脊柱矢状面重新排列需要参考姿势,文献中已通过从 GL 的水平偏移来定义。虽然这很有用,但它并没有提供有关每个椎骨节段的方向的信息,也无法区分各种生理曲线类型。

方法

在一年的时间里,共招募了 169 名患有健康脊柱的连续年轻成年受试者。(EOS 成像,巴黎,法国)进行了全身射线照相术。收集的影像学测量值包括矢状垂直轴(SVA)、T1 斜率、总颈椎角(GCA)、总胸椎角(GTA)、总腰椎角(GLA)、骨盆入射角(PI)、骨盆倾斜度(PT)、骶骨斜率(SS)、顶点和拐点椎骨。结果指标包括斜率测量值以及 T3 至 S1 个体椎骨相对于 GL 的距离偏移量。

结果

在各组之间,GLA、PI、PT、SS、前凸顶点和拐点椎骨明显不同,而 SVA、T1 斜率、GCA、GTA 和后凸顶点则没有。I 型至 IV 型组的平均 PI 至 LL 差异分别为 8.0°、2.3°、4.8°和 3.0°。在组间,T3、T7 至 T12 和 L2 至 S1 斜率以及 T9 至 L3 与 GL 的距离偏移量差异有统计学意义,而髋关节中心与 GL 的距离则没有差异。除了 I 型和 2 型曲线之间,GLA 在各个曲线类型之间均有显著差异,而拐点椎骨在 I 型和 2 型曲线之间以及 3 型和 4 型曲线之间均无显著差异。

结论

这项研究表明,在每个 Roussouly 类型中,健康成年人的每个椎骨均具有正常的矢状空间定向。组间比较表明,有可能进一步细化 Roussouly 描述的矢状曲线模式。

证据水平

3 级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验