Mihaylov Nikolay L
School of Public Health, Medical University - Varna, Varna, Bulgaria.
J Community Psychol. 2021 Nov;49(8):3054-3078. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22358. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
The anti-fracking movement (AFM) in Bulgaria, was a successful grassroots local-to-national organizing effort to change public policy. The study draws on social movements, community psychology, and grassroots democracy theory to explore, describe and critique how participants in the AFM collectively constructed meanings and practices of organizing in interaction with the sociopolitical context as they expanded their efforts from the local to the national level of policy-making. Data for the study were collected from semi-structured interviews with activists, movement documents, and participant observations. Structured and open coding followed by qualitative analyses produced descriptions and explanations of grassroots democracy in the movement. The movement was based on a prefigurative vision and practice of an antihierarchical "civic society" and was also shaped by the demands of the Bulgarian political context. Power, consent, and participation had dynamic meanings and forms that secured both grassroots democracy and effective political action. Тhe AFM resisted well-known mechanisms of hierarchization and co-optation, but it also reproduced certain inequalities of power. The findings relate to recent trends for expansion of community organizing to the national level of politics, for expansion of the community organizing models outside the United States, and for a popular grassroots preference for anti-organizational organizing.
保加利亚的反水力压裂运动(AFM)是一场成功的从地方到全国的基层组织行动,旨在改变公共政策。该研究借鉴社会运动、社区心理学和基层民主理论,探讨、描述和批判AFM的参与者在将努力从地方层面扩展到国家政策制定层面的过程中,如何与社会政治背景互动,共同构建组织的意义和实践。该研究的数据收集自对活动家的半结构化访谈、运动文件以及参与观察。通过结构化和开放编码,随后进行定性分析,得出了该运动中基层民主的描述和解释。该运动基于反等级制“公民社会”的前瞻性愿景和实践,同时也受到保加利亚政治背景需求的影响。权力、同意和参与具有动态的意义和形式,确保了基层民主和有效的政治行动。AFM抵制了众所周知的等级化和拉拢机制,但它也重现了某些权力不平等现象。这些发现与社区组织向国家政治层面扩展、在美国以外地区扩展社区组织模式以及民众对反组织形式组织的基层偏好等近期趋势相关。