• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以权力抗衡权力:保加利亚反水力压裂运动中的基层民主。

Speaking power to power: Grassroots democracy in the anti-fracking movement in Bulgaria.

作者信息

Mihaylov Nikolay L

机构信息

School of Public Health, Medical University - Varna, Varna, Bulgaria.

出版信息

J Community Psychol. 2021 Nov;49(8):3054-3078. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22358. Epub 2020 Apr 14.

DOI:10.1002/jcop.22358
PMID:32286697
Abstract

The anti-fracking movement (AFM) in Bulgaria, was a successful grassroots local-to-national organizing effort to change public policy. The study draws on social movements, community psychology, and grassroots democracy theory to explore, describe and critique how participants in the AFM collectively constructed meanings and practices of organizing in interaction with the sociopolitical context as they expanded their efforts from the local to the national level of policy-making. Data for the study were collected from semi-structured interviews with activists, movement documents, and participant observations. Structured and open coding followed by qualitative analyses produced descriptions and explanations of grassroots democracy in the movement. The movement was based on a prefigurative vision and practice of an antihierarchical "civic society" and was also shaped by the demands of the Bulgarian political context. Power, consent, and participation had dynamic meanings and forms that secured both grassroots democracy and effective political action. Тhe AFM resisted well-known mechanisms of hierarchization and co-optation, but it also reproduced certain inequalities of power. The findings relate to recent trends for expansion of community organizing to the national level of politics, for expansion of the community organizing models outside the United States, and for a popular grassroots preference for anti-organizational organizing.

摘要

保加利亚的反水力压裂运动(AFM)是一场成功的从地方到全国的基层组织行动,旨在改变公共政策。该研究借鉴社会运动、社区心理学和基层民主理论,探讨、描述和批判AFM的参与者在将努力从地方层面扩展到国家政策制定层面的过程中,如何与社会政治背景互动,共同构建组织的意义和实践。该研究的数据收集自对活动家的半结构化访谈、运动文件以及参与观察。通过结构化和开放编码,随后进行定性分析,得出了该运动中基层民主的描述和解释。该运动基于反等级制“公民社会”的前瞻性愿景和实践,同时也受到保加利亚政治背景需求的影响。权力、同意和参与具有动态的意义和形式,确保了基层民主和有效的政治行动。AFM抵制了众所周知的等级化和拉拢机制,但它也重现了某些权力不平等现象。这些发现与社区组织向国家政治层面扩展、在美国以外地区扩展社区组织模式以及民众对反组织形式组织的基层偏好等近期趋势相关。

相似文献

1
Speaking power to power: Grassroots democracy in the anti-fracking movement in Bulgaria.以权力抗衡权力:保加利亚反水力压裂运动中的基层民主。
J Community Psychol. 2021 Nov;49(8):3054-3078. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22358. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
2
From victims to citizens: Emerging activist identities in the anti-fracking movement in Bulgaria.从受害者到公民:保加利亚反水力压裂运动中新兴的激进主义身份认同。
J Community Psychol. 2020 Mar;48(2):170-191. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22258. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
3
Theoretical underpinnings of state institutionalisation of inclusion and struggles in collective health in Latin America.拉丁美洲融入式国家体制化的理论基础与集体卫生领域的斗争。
Glob Public Health. 2019 Jun-Jul;14(6-7):863-874. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2018.1455886. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
4
Building Power for Health: The Grassroots Politics of Sustaining and Strengthening Medicaid.为健康积聚力量:维持与强化医疗补助计划的基层政治
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2025 Apr 1;50(2):189-221. doi: 10.1215/03616878-11567668.
5
Civic Learning for a Democracy in Crisis.危机中的民主公民学习。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2021 Jan;51 Suppl 1:S2-S4. doi: 10.1002/hast.1221.
6
[The political context for community participation in Latin America].[拉丁美洲社区参与的政治背景]
Cad Saude Publica. 1998;14 Suppl 2:141-7.
7
Community organizing: Studying the development and exercise of grassroots power.社区组织:研究基层权力的发展与行使。
J Community Psychol. 2021 Nov;49(8):3001-3016. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22700. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
8
Empowering Change Agents: Youth Organizing Groups as Sites for Sociopolitical Development.赋权变革推动者:青年组织群体作为社会政治发展的场所。
Am J Community Psychol. 2019 Mar;63(1-2):46-60. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12315. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
9
Direct democracy and bioethical choices: voting life and death at the ballot box.直接民主与生物伦理选择:在投票箱前决定生死
Univ Mich J Law Reform. 1995 Summer;28(4):799-859.
10
Gender, globalisation, and democracy.性别、全球化与民主。
Gend Dev. 2000 Mar;8(1):20-8. doi: 10.1080/741923409.