Radical Resection Versus Simple Cholecystectomy for Gallbladder Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to review relevant randomized controlled trials or case-control studies to determine radical resection compared with simple cholecystectomy for gallbladder carcinoma.

METHODS

Using appropriate keywords, we identified relevant studies using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase. Key pertinent sources in the literature were also reviewed, and all articles published through September 2019 were considered for inclusion. For each study, we assessed odds ratios, mean difference, and 95% confidence interval (CI) to assess and synthesize outcomes.

RESULTS

We included 19 studies with a total of 1791 patients in the radical resection group and 3014 in the simple cholecystectomy group. Compared with simple cholecystectomy, radical resection significantly improved the 5-year disease-free survival rate [relative risk (RR): 1.36, 95% CI: 1.02-1.81], the 1-year overall survival (OS) rate (RR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.04-1.54), and the 3-year OS rate (RR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.02-2.85). However, there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate (RR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.87-1.23), and in the 5-year OS rate (RR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.92-1.19) between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Compared with simple cholecystectomy, radical resection has advantages in improving the 5-year disease-free survival rate, and the 1- and 3-year OS rate of gallbladder carcinoma patients.