Lindfors Perjohan, Axelsson Erland, Engstrand Karin, Störsrud Stine, Jerlstad Pernilla, Törnblom Hans, Ljótsson Brjánn, Simrén Magnus, Ringström Gisela
Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Division of Psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Gastroenterology, Sollentuna Specialistklinik, Stockholm, Sweden.
Division of Psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Apr;19(4):743-751.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.04.005. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Structured education can reduce symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), but the availability of such interventions is limited and online formats could facilitate their dissemination. We compared the effectiveness of Internet-delivered vs face-to-face education in patients with IBS, hypothesizing that the online format would not be inferior.
We conducted 2 trials of Internet-delivered vs face-to-face group education (3 weeks) at a gastroenterology outpatient clinic in Sweden. In the first trial, 141 patients with IBS were assigned randomly (1:1) to either Internet-delivered or face-to-face education, from August 2016 through June 2017. In the second trial, 155 patients with IBS were allowed to choose whether to receive education via the Internet or face to face, from August 2017 through September 2018. Patients completed questionnaires before, during, and after education. The primary outcome measure was the irritable bowel syndrome severity scoring system, which measures IBS severity on a scale from 0 to 500, based on abdominal pain, bloating, dissatisfaction with bowel habits, and interference with life. The primary test of noninferiority adhered to the intent-to-treat principle and concerned the difference in change up to 6 months after education, tested using the 1-sided CI for the time by group interaction in a linear mixed model fitted on data from the randomized controlled trial. A secondary per-protocol analysis used data from all treatment completers in both trials. The noninferiority margin was 40 points on the irritable bowel syndrome severity scoring system.
In the primary analysis, patients who received face-to-face education had an average reduction in irritable bowel syndrome severity score that was 12.2 points more than that of patients who received Internet education (1-sided 95% CI upper bound, 38.4). In the per-protocol analysis, patients who received face-to-face education reduced their average irritable bowel syndrome severity score by 14.7 points more than patients who received Internet education (95% CI upper bound, 35.5). Face-to-face education had significantly higher credibility and produced a significantly larger increase in self-rated knowledge, although most patients preferred Internet-delivered education. Between-group effects on secondary symptoms were small.
Based on the comparison of Internet-delivered vs face-to-face education for IBS, the upper bound of the CI for the difference in change up to 6 months after education was within the noninferiority margin of 40 points. We therefore conclude that Internet-delivered education is noninferior to face-to-face education. Future research should focus on increasing within-group effects. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT03466281.
结构化教育可减轻肠易激综合征(IBS)患者的症状,但此类干预措施的可及性有限,而在线形式有助于其传播。我们比较了互联网提供的教育与面对面教育对IBS患者的效果,假设在线形式并不逊色。
我们在瑞典一家胃肠病门诊进行了两项关于互联网提供的教育与面对面小组教育(为期3周)的试验。在第一项试验中,2016年8月至2017年6月,141例IBS患者被随机(1:1)分配接受互联网提供的教育或面对面教育。在第二项试验中,2017年8月至2018年9月,155例IBS患者可选择接受互联网教育或面对面教育。患者在教育前、教育期间和教育后完成问卷。主要结局指标是肠易激综合征严重程度评分系统,该系统根据腹痛、腹胀、对排便习惯的不满以及对生活的干扰,在0至500的量表上衡量IBS的严重程度。非劣效性的主要检验遵循意向性分析原则,关注教育后6个月内变化的差异,使用随机对照试验数据拟合的线性混合模型中按组交互作用的时间的单侧置信区间进行检验。一项次要的符合方案分析使用了两项试验中所有完成治疗患者的数据。肠易激综合征严重程度评分系统的非劣效性界值为40分。
在主要分析中,接受面对面教育的患者肠易激综合征严重程度评分的平均降低幅度比接受互联网教育的患者多12.2分(单侧95%置信区间上限,38.4)。在符合方案分析中,接受面对面教育的患者肠易激综合征严重程度评分的平均降低幅度比接受互联网教育的患者多14.7分(95%置信区间上限,35.5)。面对面教育具有显著更高的可信度,且自我评定的知识增加幅度显著更大,尽管大多数患者更喜欢互联网提供的教育。组间对次要症状的影响较小。
基于对IBS患者互联网提供的教育与面对面教育的比较,教育后6个月内变化差异的置信区间上限在40分的非劣效性界值范围内(40分)。因此,我们得出结论,互联网提供的教育不劣于面对面教育。未来的研究应侧重于增加组内效应。ClinicalTrials.gov编号:NCT03466281 。