Department of Neurology|, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 157 Xiwulu, Xi'an, 710004, Shaanxi, China.
Electron Microscopy Center, Department of Medicine, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, Shaanxi, China.
BMC Neurol. 2020 Apr 14;20(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-01706-3.
Following acute ischemic stroke (AIS), approximately half of patients do not achieve recanalization after intravenous administration of tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA). Thrombolysis resistance is a possible reason for recanalization failure. Thrombolysis resistance is likely related to the ultrastructure and composition of the thrombus. However, there is a paucity of published information on the relationship between thrombus ultrastructure and thrombolysis resistance.
Two patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy were observed within 4.5 h after stroke onset. One patient failed to respond to rt-PA (defined as thrombolysis resistant), and the other patient did not receive rt-PA treatment (non-rtPA). In each patient, the occluded artery was the internal carotid artery or middle cerebral artery. According to the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment classification, both patients had large atherosclerotic cerebral infarction. By scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), we found that the thrombus structure was significantly different between the two patients.
Grid-like dense fibrin, compressed polyhedral erythrocytes, and large accumulation of neutrophils may be characteristics of thrombolysis resistant thrombi.
急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)后,约半数患者静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rt-PA)后未能再通。溶栓抵抗可能是再通失败的一个原因。溶栓抵抗可能与血栓的超微结构和组成有关。然而,关于血栓超微结构与溶栓抵抗之间的关系,发表的信息很少。
两名患者在发病后 4.5 小时内接受了机械取栓术。一名患者对 rt-PA 无反应(定义为溶栓抵抗),另一名患者未接受 rt-PA 治疗(非 rt-PA)。在每个患者中,闭塞的动脉是颈内动脉或大脑中动脉。根据急性脑卒中治疗试验中的 ORG 10172 试验分类,两名患者均有大的动脉粥样硬化性脑梗死。通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)和透射电子显微镜(TEM),我们发现两名患者的血栓结构有显著差异。
网格状密集纤维蛋白、压缩多面形红细胞和大量中性粒细胞的聚集可能是溶栓抵抗血栓的特征。