Zanvyl Krieger Mind/Brain Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
J Neurophysiol. 2020 May 1;123(5):1979-1994. doi: 10.1152/jn.00112.2020. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
We perceive objects as permanent and stable despite frequent occlusions and eye movements, but their representation in the visual cortex is neither permanent nor stable. Feature selective cells respond only as long as objects are visible, and their responses depend on eye position. We explored the hypothesis that the system maintains object pointers that provide permanence and stability. Pointers should send facilitatory signals to the feature cells of an object, and these signals should persist across temporary occlusions and remap to compensate for image displacements caused by saccades. Here, we searched for such signals in monkey areas V2 and V4 (Macaca mulatta). We developed a new paradigm in which a monkey freely inspects an array of objects in search for reward while some of the objects are being occluded temporarily by opaque drifting strips. Two types of objects were used to manipulate attention. The results were as follows. ) Eye movements indicated a robust representation of location and type of the occluded objects; ) in neurons of V4, but not V2, occluded objects produced elevated activity relative to blank condition; ) the elevation of activity was reduced for objects that had been fixated immediately before the current fixation ('inhibition of return'); and ) when attended, or when the target of a saccade, visible objects produced enhanced responses in V4, but occluded objects produced no modulation. Although confirm the hypothesis, the absence of modulation under occlusion is not consistent. Further experiments are needed to resolve this discrepancy. The way we perceive objects as permanent contrasts with the short-lived responses of visual cortical neurons. A theory postulates pointers that give objects continuity, predicting a class of neurons that respond not only to visual objects but also when an occluded object moves into their receptive field. Here, we tested this theory with a novel paradigm in which a monkey freely scans an array of objects while some of them are transiently occluded.
我们能够感知到物体是稳定且持久的,尽管它们会经常被遮挡和眼睛移动,但它们在视觉皮层中的表示既不稳定也不持久。特征选择细胞仅在物体可见时才做出反应,并且它们的反应取决于眼睛的位置。我们探索了这样一种假设,即系统维持着提供稳定性和永久性的对象指针。指针应该向物体的特征细胞发送促进信号,并且这些信号应该在临时遮挡和重映射期间持续存在,以补偿由扫视引起的图像位移。在这里,我们在猴子的 V2 和 V4 区(猕猴)中寻找这样的信号。我们开发了一种新的范式,在这种范式中,猴子在搜索奖励的同时自由地检查一组物体,而一些物体被不透明的漂移条暂时遮挡。使用两种类型的物体来操纵注意力。结果如下。) 眼睛运动表明,被遮挡物体的位置和类型得到了强有力的表示;) 在 V4 神经元中,但不在 V2 神经元中,被遮挡的物体相对于空白条件产生了升高的活动;) 在当前注视之前立即注视的物体(“返回抑制”)的活动升高被降低;) 当被注视或当扫视的目标是可见物体时,V4 中产生增强的反应,但被遮挡的物体没有产生调制。尽管这些结果证实了该假说,但遮挡下的调制缺失并不一致。需要进一步的实验来解决这一差异。我们感知物体为永久性的方式与视觉皮层神经元短暂的反应形成对比。一种理论假设了指针,这些指针赋予物体连续性,预测了一类不仅对视觉物体做出反应,而且对被遮挡物体进入其感受野时也做出反应的神经元。在这里,我们使用一种新颖的范式来测试这个理论,在这个范式中,猴子自由地扫描一组物体,而其中一些物体是短暂遮挡的。