Psychology Department, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA95064.
Behav Brain Sci. 2020 Apr 15;43:e33. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X19002140.
If rationalization were ubiquitous, it would undermine a fundamental premise of human discourse. A review of key evidence indicates that rationalization is rare and confined to choices among comparable options. In contrast, reasoning is pervasive in human decision making. Within the constraints of reasoning, rationalization may operate in ambiguous situations. Studying these processes requires careful definitions and operationalizations.
如果合理化是普遍存在的,它将破坏人类话语的一个基本前提。对关键证据的回顾表明,合理化是罕见的,仅限于可比选项之间的选择。相比之下,推理在人类决策中无处不在。在推理的约束下,合理化可能在模棱两可的情况下起作用。研究这些过程需要仔细的定义和操作化。