• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算机断层扫描(CT)、磁共振成像(MRI)和对比增强超声(CEUS)在评估不明原因肾脏病变中的比较。

Comparison of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the evaluation of unclear renal lesions.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Rofo. 2020 Nov;192(11):1053-1059. doi: 10.1055/a-1127-3371. Epub 2020 Apr 15.

DOI:10.1055/a-1127-3371
PMID:32294790
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the sensitivity and specificity of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of unclear renal lesions to the histopathological outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 255 patients with a single unclear renal mass with initial imaging studies between 2005 and 2015 were included. Patient ages ranged from 18 to 86 with (mean age 62 years; SD ± 13). CEUS (255 patients), CT (88 out of 255 patients; 34.5 %) and MRI (36 out of 255 patients; 14.1 %) were used for determining malignancy or benignancy and initial findings were correlated with the histopathological outcome.

RESULTS

CEUS showed a sensitivity of 99.1 % (95 % confidence interval (CI): 96.7 %, 99.9 %), a specificity of 80.5 % (95 % CI: 65.1 %, 91.2 %), a positive predictive value (PPV) of 96.4 % (95 % CI: 93.0 %, 98.4 %) and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 94.3 % (95 % CI: 80.8 %, 99.3 %). CT showed a sensitivity of 97.1 % (95 % CI: 89.9 %, 99.6 %), a specificity of 47.4 % (95 % CI: 24.4 %, 71.1 %), a PPV of 87.0 % (95 % CI: 77.4 %, 93.6 %) and a NPV of 81.8 % (95 % CI: 48.2 %, 97.7 %). MRI showed a sensitivity of 96.4 % (95 % CI: 81.7 %, 99.9 %), a specificity of 75.0 % (95 % CI: 34.9 %, 96.8 %), a PPV of 93.1 % (95 % CI: 77.2 %, 99.2 %) and a NPV of 85.7 % (95 % CI: 42.1 %, 99.6 %). Out of the 212 malignant lesions a total of 130 clear cell renal carcinomas, 59 papillary renal cell carcinomas, 7 chromophobe renal cell carcinomas, 4 combined clear cell and papillary renal cell carcinomas and 12 other malignant lesions, e. g. metastases, were diagnosed. Out of the 43 benign lesions a total 10 angiomyolipomas, 3 oncocytomas, 8 benign renal cysts and 22 other benign lesions, e. g. renal adenomas were diagnosed. Using CEUS, 10 lesions were falsely identified as malignant or benign, whereas 8 lesions were false positive and 2 lesions false negative.

CONCLUSION

CEUS is an useful method which can be additionally used to clinically differentiate between malignant and benign renal lesions. CEUS shows a comparable sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV to CT and MRI. In daily clinical routine, patients with contraindications for other imaging modalities can particularly benefit using this method.

KEY POINTS

· Wide availability. · Safe applicability in patients with known renal insufficiency or allergies to iodine or gadolinium. · Comparable sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV to CT and MRT. · May lead to a reduction in interventional radiological or surgical interventions.

CITATION FORMAT

· Marschner CA, Ruebenthaler J, Schwarze V et al. Comparison of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the evaluation of unclear renal lesions. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2020; 192: 1053 - 1058.

摘要

目的

比较对比增强超声(CEUS)、计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)在评估不明确的肾脏病变方面的敏感性和特异性与组织病理学结果的关系。

材料和方法

共纳入 2005 年至 2015 年间 255 例单发性不明确肾脏肿块的患者。患者年龄 18-86 岁,平均年龄 62 岁±13 岁。CEUS(255 例患者)、CT(255 例患者中的 88 例;34.5%)和 MRI(255 例患者中的 36 例;14.1%)用于确定良恶性,初始发现与组织病理学结果相关。

结果

CEUS 的敏感性为 99.1%(95%置信区间:96.7%,99.9%),特异性为 80.5%(95%置信区间:65.1%,91.2%),阳性预测值(PPV)为 96.4%(95%置信区间:93.0%,98.4%),阴性预测值(NPV)为 94.3%(95%置信区间:80.8%,99.3%)。CT 的敏感性为 97.1%(95%置信区间:89.9%,99.6%),特异性为 47.4%(95%置信区间:24.4%,71.1%),PPV 为 87.0%(95%置信区间:77.4%,93.6%),NPV 为 81.8%(95%置信区间:48.2%,97.7%)。MRI 的敏感性为 96.4%(95%置信区间:81.7%,99.9%),特异性为 75.0%(95%置信区间:34.9%,96.8%),PPV 为 93.1%(95%置信区间:77.2%,99.2%),NPV 为 85.7%(95%置信区间:42.1%,99.6%)。212 例恶性病变中,共诊断出 130 例透明细胞肾细胞癌、59 例乳头状肾细胞癌、7 例嫌色细胞肾细胞癌、4 例透明细胞和乳头状肾细胞癌混合癌和 12 例其他恶性病变,例如转移瘤。43 例良性病变中,共诊断出 10 例血管平滑肌脂肪瘤、3 例嗜酸细胞瘤、8 例良性肾囊肿和 22 例其他良性病变,例如肾腺瘤。CEUS 错误地将 10 个病变识别为恶性或良性,而 8 个病变为假阳性,2 个病变为假阴性。

结论

CEUS 是一种有用的方法,可以额外用于临床区分恶性和良性肾脏病变。CEUS 与 CT 和 MRI 具有相似的敏感性、特异性、PPV 和 NPV。在日常临床实践中,患有其他成像方式禁忌症的患者尤其可以受益于该方法。

关键要点

  • 广泛应用。

  • 安全适用于已知肾功能不全或对碘或钆过敏的患者。

  • 与 CT 和 MRI 具有相似的敏感性、特异性、PPV 和 NPV。

  • 可能导致减少介入放射学或手术干预。

引文格式

  • Marschner CA, Ruebenthaler J, Schwarze V et al. Comparison of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the evaluation of unclear renal lesions. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2020; 192: 1053 - 1058.

相似文献

1
Comparison of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the evaluation of unclear renal lesions.计算机断层扫描(CT)、磁共振成像(MRI)和对比增强超声(CEUS)在评估不明原因肾脏病变中的比较。
Rofo. 2020 Nov;192(11):1053-1059. doi: 10.1055/a-1127-3371. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
2
Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the evaluation of unclear solid renal lesions.磁共振成像(MRI)与对比增强超声(CEUS)在评估不明实性肾病变中的比较。
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2016;64(4):757-763. doi: 10.3233/CH-168034.
3
Evaluation of renal lesions using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS); a 10-year retrospective European single-centre analysis.应用对比增强超声(CEUS)评价肾脏病变:10 年回顾性欧洲单中心分析。
Eur Radiol. 2018 Nov;28(11):4542-4549. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5504-1. Epub 2018 May 9.
4
The added value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in evaluation of indeterminate small solid renal masses and risk stratification of cystic renal lesions.对比增强超声在评估不确定的小肾实性肿块和囊性肾病变危险分层中的价值。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Nov;31(11):8468-8477. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07964-0. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
5
Comparing Sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasound to contrast-enhanced CT and MRI for differentially diagnosing renal lesions: a prospective multicenter study.对比声诺维超声造影与增强 CT、磁共振成像在鉴别诊断肾病变中的价值:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
World J Urol. 2024 May 8;42(1):302. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04885-7.
6
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differentiating benign from malignant solid small renal masses: comparison with contrast-enhanced CT.超声造影鉴别肾实性小肿块的良恶性:与CT增强扫描对比
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017 Aug;42(8):2135-2145. doi: 10.1007/s00261-017-1111-x.
7
Renal Complex Cystic Masses: Usefulness of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in Their Assessment and Its Agreement with Computed Tomography.肾脏复杂囊性肿块:对比增强超声(CEUS)在其评估中的应用及其与计算机断层扫描的一致性
Curr Urol Rep. 2016 Dec;17(12):89. doi: 10.1007/s11934-016-0646-7.
8
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) as a new technique to characterize suspected renal transplant malignancies in renal transplant patients in comparison to standard imaging modalities.与标准成像方式相比,超声造影(CEUS)作为一种用于鉴别肾移植患者疑似肾移植恶性肿瘤的新技术。
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2018;69(1-2):69-75. doi: 10.3233/CH-189114.
9
Role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in assessing indeterminate renal lesions and Bosniak ≥2F complex renal cysts found incidentally on CT or MRI.超声造影在评估CT或MRI偶然发现的不确定肾病变及Bosniak≥2F类复杂性肾囊肿中的作用。
Br J Radiol. 2021 Nov 1;94(1127):20210707. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20210707. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
10
Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for evaluation of cystic renal mass: in comparison to contrast-enhanced CT and conventional ultrasound.超声造影评估肾囊性肿块:与CT增强扫描及传统超声的比较
Abdom Imaging. 2014 Dec;39(6):1274-83. doi: 10.1007/s00261-014-0171-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Renal cell carcinoma of the native kidney in renal transplant recipients: case report and literature review.肾移植受者自体肾的肾细胞癌:病例报告及文献综述。
Front Oncol. 2025 Apr 29;15:1536411. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1536411. eCollection 2025.
2
Application value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the preoperative evaluation of renal cell carcinoma histological classification and RENAL score.超声造影在肾细胞癌组织学分类及RENAL评分术前评估中的应用价值
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Dec 5;14(12):9444-9458. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-694. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
3
Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Differentiating Malignant from Benign Small Renal Masses After CT/MRI.
CT/MRI检查后超声造影在鉴别肾小肿块良恶性中的诊断价值
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 29;13(21):6478. doi: 10.3390/jcm13216478.
4
Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Solid Renal Lesions.超声造影在肾实性病变诊断中的应用
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 29;13(13):3821. doi: 10.3390/jcm13133821.
5
Qualitative and quantitative assessment of non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma using contrast-enhanced ultrasound.使用超声造影技术对非透明细胞肾细胞癌进行定性和定量评估。
BMC Urol. 2024 Jun 17;24(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01514-8.
6
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differentiating benign from malignant focal solid renal lesions in pediatric patients.超声造影鉴别儿童局灶性肾脏良恶性实性病变。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 18;14(1):11409. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62496-z.
7
Superiority of magnetic resonance imaging in small renal mass diagnosis where image reports mismatches between computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.在 CT 与 MRI 图像报告不匹配的小肾肿块诊断中,磁共振成像具有优势。
Investig Clin Urol. 2023 Mar;64(2):148-153. doi: 10.4111/icu.20220375.
8
Case Report: Robot-assisted laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery for a renal abscess mimicking a tumor.病例报告:机器人辅助腹腔镜保留肾单位手术治疗一例酷似肿瘤的肾脓肿。
Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 31;12:1027571. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1027571. eCollection 2022.
9
Comparison of the Application Value for Diagnosis of Chronic Kidney Disease between Color Doppler Flow Quantification Technique and Computed Tomography.彩色多普勒血流量化技术与计算机断层扫描诊断慢性肾脏病的应用价值比较。
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022 Jul 8;2022:6485273. doi: 10.1155/2022/6485273. eCollection 2022.
10
The definitive role of CEUS in an ambiguous case of renal cell carcinoma.对比增强超声在肾细胞癌疑难病例中的决定性作用。
J Ultrason. 2021 Aug 16;21(86):e248-e251. doi: 10.15557/JoU.2021.0040. Epub 2021 Sep 9.