Wang H, Huang H Y, Liu C C, Bai F Z, Zhu J, Wang L, Yan X X, Chen Y S, Chen H D, Zhang Y M, Ren J S, Zou S M, Li N, Zheng Z X, Feng H, Bai H J, Zhang J, Chen W Q, Dai M, Shi J F
Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Department of Endoscopy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Mar 10;41(3):429-435. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2020.03.028.
This study was to systematically update the economic evaluation evidence of colorectal cancer screening in mainland China. Based on a systematic review published in 2015, we expanded the scope of retrieval database (PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Data, VIP, CBM) and extended it to December 2018. Focusing on the evidence for nearly 10 years (2009-2018), basic characteristics and main results were extracted. Costs were discounted to 2017 using the consumer price index of medical and health care being provided to the residents, and the ratio of incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) to per capita GDP in corresponding years were calculated. A total of 12 articles (8 new ones) were included, of which 9 were population-based (all cross-sectional studies) and 3 were model-based. Most of the initial screening age was 40 years (7 articles), and most of the frequency was once in a lifetime (11 articles). Technologies used for primary screening included: questionnaire assessment, immunological fecal occult blood test (iFOBT) and endoscopy. The most commonly used indicator was the cost per colorectal cancer detected, and the median (range) of the 20 screening schemes was 52 307 Chinese Yuan (12 967-3 769 801, =20). The cost per adenoma detected was 9 220 Yuan (1 859-40 535, =10). In 3 articles, the cost per life year saved (compared with noscreening) was mentioned and the ratio of ICER to GDP was 0.673 (-0.013-2.459, =11), which was considered by WHO as "very cost-effective" ; The range of ratios overlapped greatly among different technologies and screening frequencies, but the initial age for screening seemed more cost-effective at the age of 50 years (0.002, -0.013-0.015, =3), than at the 40 year-olds (0.781, 0.321-2.459, =8). Results from the population-based studies showed that the cost per adenoma detected was only 1/6 of the cost per colorectal cancer detected, and limited ICER evidence suggested that screening for colorectal cancer was generally cost-effective in Chinese population. Despite the inconclusiveness of the optimal screening technology, the findings suggested that the initial screening might be more cost-effective at older age. No high-level evidence such as randomized controlled trial evaluation was found.
本研究旨在系统更新中国大陆结直肠癌筛查的经济学评价证据。基于2015年发表的一项系统评价,我们扩大了检索数据库的范围(PubMed、EMbase、The Cochrane Library、Web of Science、中国知网、万方数据、维普资讯、中国生物医学文献数据库),并将检索时间延长至2018年12月。聚焦近10年(2009 - 2018年)的证据,提取了基本特征和主要结果。使用向居民提供的医疗卫生保健消费价格指数将成本贴现至2017年,并计算相应年份的增量成本效果比(ICER)与人均GDP的比值。共纳入12篇文章(8篇新文章),其中9篇基于人群(均为横断面研究),3篇基于模型。大多数初始筛查年龄为40岁(7篇文章),大多数筛查频率为一生一次(11篇文章)。用于初筛的技术包括:问卷调查评估、免疫法粪便潜血试验(iFOBT)和内镜检查。最常用的指标是每例检测出的结直肠癌成本,20种筛查方案的中位数(范围)为52 307元人民币(12 967 - 3 769 801,n = 20)。每例检测出的腺瘤成本为9 220元(1 859 - 40 535,n = 10)。3篇文章中提到了每挽救一个生命年的成本(与未筛查相比),ICER与GDP的比值为0.673(-0.013 - 2.459,n = 11),世界卫生组织认为这是“非常具有成本效益的”;不同技术和筛查频率之间的比值范围有很大重叠,但筛查起始年龄在50岁时似乎更具成本效益(0.002,-0.013 - 0.015,n = 3),高于40岁时(0.781,0.321 - 2.459,n = 8)。基于人群的研究结果表明,每例检测出的腺瘤成本仅为每例检测出的结直肠癌成本的1/6,有限的ICER证据表明在中国人群中结直肠癌筛查总体上具有成本效益。尽管最佳筛查技术尚无定论,但研究结果表明起始筛查在较高年龄时可能更具成本效益。未发现如随机对照试验评价等高级别证据。