Conway Andrew R A, Hao Han
Department of Psychology, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA 91711, USA.
J Intell. 2020 Apr 13;8(2):15. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence8020015.
In the current issue of the , Hannon (2019) reports a novel and intriguing pattern of results that could be interpreted as evidence that the SAT is biased against Hispanic students. Specifically, Hannon's analyses suggest that non-cognitive factors, such as test anxiety, contribute to SAT performance and the impact of test anxiety on the SAT is stronger among Hispanic students than European-American students. Importantly, this pattern of results was observed after controlling for individual differences in cognitive abilities. We argue that there are multiple issues with Hannon's investigation and interpretation. For instance, Hannon did not include an adequate number or variety of measures of cognitive ability. In addition, the measure of test anxiety was a retrospective self-report survey on evaluated anxiety rather than a direct measure of situational test anxiety associated with the SAT. Based on these and other observations, we conclude that Hannon's current results do not provide sufficient evidence to suggest that non-cognitive factors play a significant role in the SAT or that they impact European-American and Hispanic students differently.
在本期《 》中,汉农(2019年)报告了一种新颖且有趣的结果模式,这种模式可被解释为SAT对西班牙裔学生存在偏见的证据。具体而言,汉农的分析表明,诸如考试焦虑等非认知因素会影响SAT成绩,并且考试焦虑对SAT的影响在西班牙裔学生中比在欧美裔学生中更强。重要的是,这种结果模式是在控制了认知能力的个体差异之后观察到的。我们认为汉农的调查和解释存在多个问题。例如,汉农没有纳入足够数量或种类的认知能力测量指标。此外,考试焦虑的测量是一项关于评估焦虑的回顾性自我报告调查,而非对与SAT相关的情境性考试焦虑的直接测量。基于这些及其他观察结果,我们得出结论,汉农目前的结果并未提供充分证据表明非认知因素在SAT中起重要作用,或者它们对欧美裔和西班牙裔学生的影响存在差异。