Anatomic Pathology Unit, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Via Sergio Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Jun;301(6):1355-1363. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05542-1. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) identified four prognostic subgroups of endometrial carcinoma: copy-number-low/p53-wild-type (p53wt), POLE-mutated/ultramutated (POLEmt), microsatellite-instability/hypermutated (MSI), and copy-number-high/p53-mutated (p53mt). However, it is still unclear if they may be integrated with the current histopathological prognostic factors, such as histotype.
To assess the impact of histotype on the prognostic value of the TCGA molecular subgroups of endometrial carcinoma.
A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed by searching 7 electronic databases from their inception to April 2019 for studies assessing prognosis in all TCGA subgroups of endometrial carcinoma. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) was calculated in two different groups ("all-histotypes" and "endometrioid"), using p53wt subgroup as reference standard; HR for non-endometrioid histotypes was calculated indirectly. Disease-specific survival and progression-free survival were assessed as additional analyses.
Six studies with 2818 patients were included. In the p53mt subgroup, pooled HRs for OS were 4.322 (all-histotypes), 2.505 (endometrioid), and 4.937 (non-endometrioid). In the MSI subgroup, pooled HRs were 1.965 (all-histotypes), 1.287 (endometrioid), and 6.361 (non-endometrioid). In the POLEmt subgroup, pooled HRs were 0.763 (all-histotypes), 0.481 (endometrioid), and 2.634 (non-endometrioid). Results of additional analyses were consistent for all subgroups except for non-endometrioid POLEmt carcinomas.
Histotype of endometrial carcinoma shows a crucial prognostic value independently of the TCGA molecular subgroup, with non-endometrioid carcinomas having a worse prognosis in each TCGA subgroup. Histotype should be integrated with molecular characterization for the risk stratification of patients in the future.
癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)确定了子宫内膜癌的四个预后亚组:拷贝数低/p53 野生型(p53wt)、POLE 突变/超高突变(POLEmt)、微卫星不稳定/高突变(MSI)和拷贝数高/p53 突变(p53mt)。然而,目前尚不清楚它们是否可以与当前的组织病理学预后因素(如组织类型)相结合。
评估组织类型对 TCGA 子宫内膜癌分子亚组预后价值的影响。
通过检索 7 个电子数据库,从其成立到 2019 年 4 月,对所有 TCGA 子宫内膜癌亚组进行了预后评估的研究进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。使用 p53wt 亚组作为参考标准,计算总生存期(OS)的汇总风险比(HR);间接计算非子宫内膜样组织类型的 HR。作为附加分析,评估了疾病特异性生存率和无进展生存率。
纳入了 6 项包含 2818 例患者的研究。在 p53mt 亚组中,OS 的汇总 HR 分别为 4.322(所有组织类型)、2.505(子宫内膜样)和 4.937(非子宫内膜样)。在 MSI 亚组中,汇总 HR 分别为 1.965(所有组织类型)、1.287(子宫内膜样)和 6.361(非子宫内膜样)。在 POLEmt 亚组中,汇总 HR 分别为 0.763(所有组织类型)、0.481(子宫内膜样)和 2.634(非子宫内膜样)。除了非子宫内膜样 POLEmt 癌外,各亚组的其他分析结果均一致。
子宫内膜癌的组织类型具有独立于 TCGA 分子亚组的重要预后价值,非子宫内膜样癌在每个 TCGA 亚组中预后更差。在未来,组织类型应与分子特征相结合,对患者进行风险分层。