Karges D E
University of Washington, Seattle.
Foot Ankle. 1988 Dec;9(3):120-4. doi: 10.1177/107110078800900305.
A retrospective study was done of 51 patients (6 males and 45 females) who had 57 primary interdigital neurectomies performed through a plantar incision. The surgical technique is described. The results were divided into three categories, in which 26 feet were judged excellent, 27 feet rated good, and 4 feet were classed as poor. The author concludes that the plantar approach is technically simple and results in a comfortable scar. Poor results occurred in 4 of 57 feet. This failure rate compares favorably with those failure rates in reported series done through a dorsal incision. In the author's opinion, the ability to do a more proximal resection of the nerve--as compared with the dorsal approach--is responsible for the higher rate of success with this method.
对51例患者(6例男性和45例女性)进行了一项回顾性研究,这些患者通过足底切口进行了57次原发性指间神经切除术。描述了手术技术。结果分为三类,其中26只足判定为优,27只足评定为良,4只足归类为差。作者得出结论,足底入路技术简单,瘢痕舒适。57只足中有4只效果不佳。与通过背侧切口进行的报道系列中的失败率相比,该失败率具有优势。在作者看来,与背侧入路相比,能够对神经进行更近端的切除是该方法成功率较高的原因。