Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1243:147-162. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-40204-4_10.
Targeting aberrant protein homeostasis (proteostasis) in cancer is an attractive therapeutic strategy. However, this approach has thus far proven difficult to bring to clinical practice, with one major exception: proteasome inhibition. These small molecules have dramatically transformed outcomes for patients with the blood cancer multiple myeloma. However, these agents have failed to make an impact in more common solid tumors. Major questions remain about whether this therapeutic strategy can be extended to benefit even more patients. Here we discuss the role of the proteasome in normal and tumor cells, the basic, preclinical, and clinical development of proteasome inhibitors, and mechanisms proposed to govern both intrinsic and acquired resistance to these drugs. Years of study of both the mechanism of action and modes of resistance to proteasome inhibitors reveal these processes to be surprisingly complex. Here, we attempt to draw lessons from experience with proteasome inhibitors that may be relevant for other compounds targeting proteostasis in cancer, as well as extending the reach of proteasome inhibitors beyond blood cancers.
靶向癌症中异常的蛋白质稳态(蛋白质平衡)是一种有吸引力的治疗策略。然而,到目前为止,这种方法很难付诸临床实践,只有一个主要的例外:蛋白酶体抑制。这些小分子极大地改变了血液癌多发性骨髓瘤患者的预后。然而,这些药物在更为常见的实体瘤中并未产生影响。人们仍然存在重大疑问,即这种治疗策略是否可以扩展到使更多的患者受益。在这里,我们讨论了蛋白酶体在正常细胞和肿瘤细胞中的作用、蛋白酶体抑制剂的基础、临床前和临床开发,以及用于控制这些药物的内在和获得性耐药的机制。多年来对蛋白酶体抑制剂的作用机制和耐药模式的研究表明,这些过程非常复杂。在这里,我们试图从蛋白酶体抑制剂的经验中吸取教训,这些经验可能与针对癌症中蛋白质平衡的其他化合物有关,并将蛋白酶体抑制剂的应用范围扩展到血液癌以外。