Suppr超能文献

ICMJE 建议:加强出版诚信面临的挑战。

The ICMJE recommendations: challenges in fortifying publishing integrity.

机构信息

, P. O. Box 7, Miki-cho post office, Ikenobe 3011-2, Kagawa-ken, 761-0799, Japan.

出版信息

Ir J Med Sci. 2020 Nov;189(4):1179-1181. doi: 10.1007/s11845-020-02227-1. Epub 2020 Apr 15.

Abstract

In December of 2019, the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) updated its recommendations. As occurs regularly with the ICMJE recommendations, this document was edited and tweaked, and thus fortified and verified. At least one new fortifying positive element was introduced, namely that peer reviewers who relied on the assistance of others during peer review need to declare this to editors. This fortifies publishing integrity, via transparency, in the peer review process in biomedical science. However, a new clause was introduced: "Authors should avoid citing articles in predatory or pseudo-journals." This is controversial because the precise nature of "predatory" publishing venues, either journals or publishers, is unclear and several parameters used by existing blacklists are unreliable and thus debatable. It is concerning that these edited recommendations were simultaneously published in 13 medical journals.

摘要

2019 年 12 月,国际医学期刊编辑委员会(ICMJE)更新了其建议。与 ICMJE 建议的定期情况一样,本文件经过编辑和调整,因此得到了加强和验证。至少引入了一个新的强化积极因素,即同行评审员在同行评审过程中依靠他人的协助,需要向编辑声明这一点。这通过生物医学科学中的同行评审过程的透明度来加强出版诚信。然而,引入了一个新的条款:“作者应避免引用掠夺性或伪期刊的文章。”这是有争议的,因为“掠夺性”出版场所(无论是期刊还是出版商)的确切性质尚不清楚,并且现有黑名单使用的几个参数不可靠,因此存在争议。令人担忧的是,这些经过编辑的建议同时在 13 种医学期刊上发表。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验