• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经宫颈 Foley 球囊联合阴道米索前列醇与单纯阴道米索前列醇用于初产妇肥胖患者宫颈成熟的比较:一项多中心、随机、对照有效性试验。

Transcervical Foley Balloon Plus Vaginal Misoprostol versus Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening in Nulliparous Obese Women: A Multicenter, Randomized, Comparative-Effectiveness Trial.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine, Vermillion, South Dakota.

Avera Medical Group Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Sioux Falls, South Dakota.

出版信息

Am J Perinatol. 2021 Aug;38(S 01):e123-e128. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1708805. Epub 2020 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1055/s-0040-1708805
PMID:32299108
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Nulliparous obese women are at increased risk of labor induction and cesarean delivery (CD). We sought to determine whether the combination of a transvaginal Foley balloon plus misoprostol prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) is superior to misoprostol alone in reducing the risk for CD.

STUDY DESIGN

We undertook a multicenter, open-label, comparative-effectiveness randomized clinical trial of nulliparous obese women with unfavorable cervix (Bishop's score ≤ 6) undergoing labor induction from January 2016 to June 2018 at three tertiary centers. Those at <32 weeks' gestation, premature rupture of membranes, stillbirth, and major fetal anomalies were excluded. Women were randomized 1:1 to either a combination of Foley balloon and misoprostol or misoprostol alone. Once Bishop's score was >6, further management was deferred to treating physicians. Primary outcome was the rate of CD. Secondary maternal outcomes included duration of induction-to-delivery interval, occurrence of tachysystole, clinical chorioamnionitis, need for operative vaginal delivery, as well as a composite of maternal morbidity (postpartum endometritis, surgical-site infection, venous thromboembolism, need for transfusion, intensive care unit admission, and maternal death). Secondary neonatal outcomes included need for neonatal intensive care unit admission, transient tachypnea of the newborn, respiratory distress syndrome, meconium aspiration syndrome, culture-proven sepsis, neonatal seizures, and a composite of neonatal morbidity (Apgar's score ≤7 at 5 minutes, umbilical artery cord pH ≤7.10, birth injury, perinatal death). With the rate of CD rate being 53% at Children's Memorial Herman Hospital among nulliparous obese women who underwent induction of labor at ≥32 weeks and met our inclusion criteria; 250 women (125 women per group) were required to answer the study question. All analyses were by intention to treat.

RESULTS

Of the 236 women randomized, 113 (48%) were allocated to group 1 (combined Foley and PGE1) and 123 (52%) to group 2 (PGE1 alone). The rate of CD was similar between the groups (45 vs. 43%,  = 0.84, relative risk [RR]: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.75-1.42). There was no difference in the occurrence of tachysystole that resulted in fetal heart rate abnormalities between the groups (8.8 vs. 16.2%,  = 0.09, RR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.27-1.11). The total duration of the induction-to-delivery interval was also similar between the groups (24.8 ± 13.8 vs. 24.5 ± 14.0 hours,  = 0.87) regardless of the mode of delivery. No differences were seen in the indications for CD and secondary maternal or neonatal outcomes.

CONCLUSION

In this trial of nulliparous obese women undergoing labor induction, cervical ripening with combined Foley balloon and PGE1 resulted in similar CD rates than ripening with vaginal PGE1 alone.

KEY POINTS

· Nulliparous obese women are at increased risk for cesarean delivery.. · Combined intravaginal misoprostol-Foley balloon versus misoprostol alone resulted in similar rates of cesarean delivery.. · Further research is warranted to determine the optimal cervical ripening strategy in this population..

摘要

目的

初产妇肥胖女性行引产及剖宫产(CD)的风险增加。我们旨在确定经阴道放置 Foley 球囊联合米索前列醇前列腺素 E1(PGE1)与单用米索前列醇相比,是否能降低 CD 的风险。

研究设计

我们在三家三级中心进行了一项多中心、开放标签、比较效果的随机临床试验,纳入了 2016 年 1 月至 2018 年 6 月间行引产的初产妇肥胖且宫颈条件不佳(Bishop 评分≤6)的患者。排除了孕周<32 周、胎膜早破、死胎和主要胎儿畸形的患者。将患者以 1:1 的比例随机分为 Foley 球囊联合米索前列醇组或米索前列醇组。当 Bishop 评分>6 时,进一步的管理推迟到主治医生。主要结局是 CD 发生率。次要的产妇结局包括引产至分娩的间隔时间、发生心动过速、临床绒毛膜羊膜炎、需要经阴道分娩、以及产妇发病率的复合指标(产后子宫内膜炎、手术部位感染、静脉血栓栓塞、需要输血、入住重症监护病房和产妇死亡)。次要新生儿结局包括需要入住新生儿重症监护病房、新生儿一过性呼吸急促、呼吸窘迫综合征、胎粪吸入综合征、培养阳性败血症、新生儿癫痫发作以及新生儿发病率的复合指标(5 分钟时 Apgar 评分≤7、脐动脉血 pH 值≤7.10、产伤、围产儿死亡)。在我们的纳入标准中,在儿童纪念赫尔曼医院行引产的初产妇肥胖女性中,CD 发生率为 53%;因此,需要 250 名(每组 125 名)患者来回答研究问题。所有分析均采用意向治疗。

结果

在随机的 236 名患者中,113 名(48%)被分配到第 1 组(联合 Foley 和 PGE1),123 名(52%)被分配到第 2 组(单用 PGE1)。两组的 CD 发生率相似(45% vs. 43%, = 0.84,相对风险[RR]:1.03,95%CI:0.75-1.42)。两组间因心动过速导致胎心异常的发生率无差异(8.8% vs. 16.2%, = 0.09,RR:0.54,95%CI:0.27-1.11)。两组引产至分娩的总间隔时间也相似(24.8 ± 13.8 小时 vs. 24.5 ± 14.0 小时, = 0.87),无论分娩方式如何。CD 的指征以及次要的产妇和新生儿结局无差异。

结论

在这项初产妇肥胖女性行引产的试验中,与单用阴道 PGE1 相比,联合 Foley 球囊和 PGE1 进行宫颈成熟,CD 发生率相似。

关键点

· 初产妇肥胖女性行剖宫产的风险增加。· 经阴道放置米索前列醇-Foley 球囊与单用米索前列醇相比,剖宫产率相似。· 需要进一步研究确定该人群中最佳的宫颈成熟策略。

相似文献

1
Transcervical Foley Balloon Plus Vaginal Misoprostol versus Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening in Nulliparous Obese Women: A Multicenter, Randomized, Comparative-Effectiveness Trial.经宫颈 Foley 球囊联合阴道米索前列醇与单纯阴道米索前列醇用于初产妇肥胖患者宫颈成熟的比较:一项多中心、随机、对照有效性试验。
Am J Perinatol. 2021 Aug;38(S 01):e123-e128. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1708805. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
2
Combination of Foley and prostaglandins versus Foley and oxytocin for cervical ripening: a network meta-analysis. Foley 导尿管联合前列腺素与 Foley 导尿管联合催产素用于宫颈成熟:网状荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Nov;223(5):743.e1-743.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.007. Epub 2020 May 7.
3
Combination of Foley bulb and vaginal misoprostol compared with vaginal misoprostol alone for cervical ripening and labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Foley 球囊联合米索前列醇与单独使用米索前列醇用于宫颈成熟和引产的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Feb;121(2 Pt 1):247-252. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31827e5dca.
4
Misoprostol With Foley Bulb Compared With Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Randomized Controlled Trial.米索前列醇联合Foley球囊与单用米索前列醇用于宫颈成熟的比较:一项随机对照试验
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;131(1):23-29. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002403.
5
Buccal vs vaginal misoprostol combined with Foley catheter for cervical ripening at term (the BEGIN trial): a randomized controlled trial.经阴道与经口腔使用米索前列醇联合 Foley 导管用于足月宫颈成熟(BEGIN 试验):一项随机对照试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 May;224(5):524.e1-524.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.02.016. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
6
Evaluation of mechanical and nonmechanical methods of cervix ripening in women with pre-labor rupture of membranes: a randomized controlled trial.胎膜早破孕妇宫颈成熟的机械和非机械方法评估:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Apr;5(4):100868. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100868. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
7
Six vs 12 hours of Foley catheter balloon placement in the labor induction of multiparas with unfavorable cervixes: a randomized controlled trial.六小时与十二小时 Foley 导尿管球囊放置在多产妇不利宫颈引产中的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Nov;5(11):101142. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101142. Epub 2023 Aug 27.
8
Maternal and neonatal outcomes with mechanical cervical dilation plus misoprostol compared to misoprostol alone for cervical ripening; a systematic review of literature and metaanalysis.机械性宫颈扩张加米索前列醇与单独使用米索前列醇用于宫颈成熟的母婴结局:文献系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2019 May;1(2):101-111. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2019.06.003. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
9
Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter used alone or combined with a single dose of dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study.单独使用宫颈内 Foley 导管或联合单剂量地诺前列酮凝胶用于宫颈成熟的比较:一项随机研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 May;39(4):461-467. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2018.1534090. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
10
[Cervical Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial].[宫颈 Foley 导管与阴道米索前列醇用于宫颈成熟和引产:一项随机临床试验]
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2010 Jul;32(7):346-51. doi: 10.1590/s0100-72032010000700007.

引用本文的文献

1
Data-sharing and trustworthiness of trials evaluating cervical ripening in induction of labour: a meta-epidemiological study of randomised controlled trials.引产中评估宫颈成熟度的试验的数据共享与可信度:一项随机对照试验的Meta流行病学研究
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Jul 8;85:103346. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103346. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Methods of induction of labor in women with obesity: A secondary analysis of two multicenter randomized controlled trials.肥胖孕妇引产方法:两项多中心随机对照试验的二次分析。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Mar;103(3):470-478. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14737. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
3
The prevalence and associated factors of success of labor induction in Hargeisa maternity hospitals, Hargeisa Somaliland 2022: a hospital-based cross-sectional study.
2022 年,在索马里兰哈尔格萨的妇产医院,进行了一项基于医院的横断面研究,旨在调查劳动诱导的流行率及其成功的相关因素。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Jun 13;23(1):437. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05655-w.
4
Is Misoprostol Vaginal Insert Safe for the Induction of Labor in High-Risk Pregnancy Obese Women?米索前列醇阴道栓剂用于高危妊娠肥胖妇女引产是否安全?
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Apr 14;9(4):464. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9040464.