Catella Judith, Bertoletti Laurent, Mismetti Patrick, Ollier Edouard, Samperiz Angel, Soler Silvia, Suriñach José Maria, Mahé Isabelle, Lorente Manuel Alejandro, Braester Andrei, Monreal Manuel
Service de Médecine Vasculaire et Thérapeutique, CHU de St-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.
INSERM, UMR1059, Equipe Dysfonction Vasculaire et Hémostase, Université Jean-Monnet, Saint-Etienne, France.
J Thromb Haemost. 2020 Jul;18(7):1728-1737. doi: 10.1111/jth.14837. Epub 2020 May 11.
Detection of severe renal impairment in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) is mandatory both for selecting anticoagulant therapy and for evaluating major bleeding risk, increased by severe renal impairment.
To determine whether the Cockcroft and Gault (CG) and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formulas identify severe renal impairment in the same VTE patients presenting the same risk of major bleeding.
PATIENTS/METHODS: We compared clinical characteristics and outcomes during the first 3 months of anticoagulation between VTE patients in the RIETE registry with severe renal impairment according to the CG and/or CKD-EPI formula (estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min and <30 mL/min/1.73 m , respectively). The primary outcome was major bleeding.
Up to October 2017, 41 796 patients were included in RIETE. Among the 4676 patients with severe renal impairment according to at least one of the formulas, this was not confirmed by the other formula in 1904 (40.7%). Major bleeding risk was increased in every patient subgroup with severe renal impairment vs patients without this condition (CG or CKD-EPI < 30: odds ratio [OR] = 2.26, 95% confidence interval [CI 2.01-2.53], only CG < 30: OR = 1.72, 95% CI [1.37-2.13], only CKD-EPI < 30: OR = 2.34, 95% CI [1.77-3.05], CG+CKD-EPI < 30: OR = 2.47, 95% CI [2.16-2.83], all vs CG+CKD-EPI > 30).
The CG and CKD-EPI formulas identify different subgroups of patients with severe renal impairment, leading to discordant results in 40.7% of these patients. Irrespective of the formula used for their identification, patients with severe renal impairment have a higher risk of major bleeding under anticoagulant therapy.
对于静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)患者,检测严重肾功能损害对于选择抗凝治疗以及评估因严重肾功能损害而增加的大出血风险均至关重要。
确定Cockcroft和Gault(CG)公式以及慢性肾脏病流行病学协作组(CKD-EPI)公式在识别具有相同大出血风险的同一VTE患者中的严重肾功能损害时是否一致。
患者/方法:我们比较了RIETE注册中心中根据CG和/或CKD-EPI公式(估计肾小球滤过率分别<30 mL/min和<30 mL/min/1.73 m²)诊断为严重肾功能损害的VTE患者在抗凝治疗前3个月的临床特征和结局。主要结局为大出血。
截至2017年10月,RIETE共纳入41796例患者。在根据至少一种公式诊断为严重肾功能损害的4676例患者中,1904例(40.7%)未被另一种公式确认。与无严重肾功能损害的患者相比,每个严重肾功能损害患者亚组的大出血风险均增加(CG或CKD-EPI<30:比值比[OR]=2.26,95%置信区间[CI 2.01-2.53];仅CG<30:OR=1.72,95%CI[1.37-2.13];仅CKD-EPI<30:OR=2.34,95%CI[1.77-3.05];CG+CKD-EPI<30:OR=2.47,95%CI[2.16-2.83],所有亚组与CG+CKD-EPI>30的亚组相比)。
CG和CKD-EPI公式识别出的严重肾功能损害患者亚组不同,导致40.7%的此类患者结果不一致。无论使用哪种公式进行识别,严重肾功能损害患者在抗凝治疗下发生大出血的风险更高。