Suppr超能文献

国家级篮球裁判员在不同比赛级别中的身体、生理和技术需求。

Physical, physiological, and technical demands of national netball umpires at different competition levels.

机构信息

School of Sport and Recreation, Sport Performance Research Institute New Zealand, Auckland University of Technology , Auckland, New Zealand.

School of Health and Sports Sciences, University of Suffolk , Ipswich, UK.

出版信息

J Sports Sci. 2020 Jul;38(14):1660-1665. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1754718. Epub 2020 Apr 16.

Abstract

To compare demands of national netball umpires between levels of competition, 22 Netball New Zealand high-performance umpires participated in this investigation. These included from highest to lowest standard: 9 × semi-professional ANZ Championships (ANZC); 6 × National A Squad (NZA); and 7 × National Development Squad (DEV). Physical (global positioning system tri-axial accelerometry), physiological (heart rate) and technical (video analysis) demands were determined for 48 (16 per group) umpire match performances. Level of competition had no significant effect on physical or mean physiological demands. However, ANZC umpires spent a lower proportion of time at low heart rates compared to DEV, and a greater proportion of time at high, rather than moderate, heart rates compared to NZA. Compared to lower standard umpires, ANZC spent lesser proportions of time standing but greater proportions of time walking backwards and sideways, and turning to change direction. Furthermore, ANZC umpires spent lower proportions of time jogging, but greater proportions of time sprinting compared to DEV. Finally, ANZC umpires spent longer mean durations than DEV on the goal third side line. As such, the difference in demands experienced by national netball umpires between levels of competition is more technical than physical or physiological.

摘要

为了比较不同比赛级别下的国家无挡板篮球裁判员的需求,22 名新西兰无挡板篮球协会的高绩效裁判员参与了此项调查。这些裁判员的级别从高到低依次为:9 名半职业的澳新银行锦标赛(ANZC);6 名国家 A 队(NZA);和 7 名国家发展队(DEV)。48 名(每组 16 名)裁判员的 48 场比赛表现的物理(全球定位系统三轴加速度计)、生理(心率)和技术(视频分析)需求都被确定了下来。比赛级别对物理或平均生理需求没有显著影响。然而,与 DEV 相比,ANZC 的裁判员在低心率下的时间比例较低,在高心率下的时间比例较高,而在中心率下的时间比例较低。与较低标准的裁判员相比,ANZC 的裁判员站立时间比例较小,但向后和向侧面走的时间比例较大,转身改变方向的时间比例也较大。此外,ANZC 的裁判员慢跑时间比例较小,但冲刺时间比例较大,与 DEV 相比。最后,ANZC 的裁判员在球门三分之一侧线上的平均持续时间比 DEV 长。因此,不同比赛级别下国家无挡板篮球裁判员的需求差异更多是技术上的,而不是物理或生理上的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验