Retina Private Office, University of Buenos Aires, 525 Aguirre St., 3rd Floor, Apt. A, Buenos Aires, 1414, Argentina.
Ophthalmology Division, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Acta Diabetol. 2020 Oct;57(10):1151-1157. doi: 10.1007/s00592-020-01530-8. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
Intraoperative complications in cataract surgery are more common in diabetic patients. Solving aphakia in these circumstances remains a challenge, as the scleral structure has been shown to be different in diabetes. This study aims to analyze the role of a secondary sutureless scleral intraocular lens (IOL) flanged fixation in diabetic patients without capsular support and to compare the anatomical and functional outcomes using a 30 gauge (G) ultrathin wall needle vs. a 27G needle.
Retrospective, observational cohort study. 105 eyes (105 patients) who underwent PPV with secondary IOL fixation using a sutureless 27G (n = 51) or a 30G ultrathin wall (UTW) needle technique (n = 54) and had a 24 months postoperative follow up. Consecutive patients' records were reviewed for lens stability and centration parameters, intra- and postoperative complications at 7 days, 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Correlations between outcome measures and needle size (27G vs. 30G UTW) were analyzed.
IOL displacement occurred in 30 patients (41.2%) in the 27G group and did not occur in the 30G UTW needle group (p < 0.001). Mean time until IOL displacement was 10.5 ± 7.0 months (range: 7 days-24 months). IOL centricity was significantly better in the 30G ultrathin wall needle group compared to 27 G (p = 0.001). Additional surgical interventions were necessary only in the 27G group (n = 14).
Sutureless IOL flanged technique using a 30G UTW needle is more predictable and has less complications in aphakic diabetic patients, compared to a 27G needle technique.
白内障手术中的术中并发症在糖尿病患者中更为常见。在这些情况下,解决无晶状体问题仍然是一个挑战,因为已经证明糖尿病患者的巩膜结构有所不同。本研究旨在分析在没有囊袋支持的糖尿病患者中使用无缝线巩膜眼内透镜(IOL)翻边固定的辅助二次缝线的作用,并比较使用 30 号(G)超薄壁针与 27G 针的解剖和功能结果。
回顾性观察队列研究。105 只眼(105 例患者)接受了经瞳孔玻璃体切除术(PPV),并使用无缝线 27G(n = 51)或 30G 超薄壁(UTW)针技术(n = 54)进行了二次 IOL 固定,并在术后 24 个月进行了随访。回顾连续患者的记录,以评估晶状体稳定性和中心参数、术后 7 天、1、3、6、12 和 24 个月的术中及术后并发症。分析了结果测量值与针大小(27G 与 30G UTW)之间的相关性。
27G 组中有 30 例(41.2%)患者发生 IOL 移位,而 30G UTW 针组中未发生 IOL 移位(p < 0.001)。IOL 移位的平均时间为 10.5 ± 7.0 个月(范围:7 天至 24 个月)。30G UTW 针组的 IOL 中心性明显优于 27G 组(p = 0.001)。仅在 27G 组中需要进行额外的手术干预(n = 14)。
与 27G 针技术相比,在无晶状体糖尿病患者中使用 30G UTW 针的无缝线 IOL 翻边技术更具预测性,并发症更少。