Chang Feng, Wang Tao, Yu Juan, Li Mei, Lu Ning, Chen Xiao
Department of Ophthalmology, General Hospital of Central Theater Command of People's Liberation Army of China, Wuhan, Hubei.
Strabismus. 2020 Mar;28(1):7-12. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2020.1717552.
Acute acquired concomitant esotropia (AACE) is a distinct subtype of esotropia. The purpose of this retrospective study was to describe the clinical characteristics and discuss the diagnostic and therapeutic management, and evaluate the effect of prism treatment. The records of 30 patients who presented with acute-onset diplopia at the General Hospital of Central Theater Command from August 2015 to November 2018 were reviewed. All patients underwent a complete medical history, ophthalmological and orthoptic examinations, and brain and orbital imaging. The patients were followed up between 2 and 8 months (mean 3.9 ± 1.2). Angle of strabismus, refractive error, stereopsis, and results of treatment with prisms were analyzed. Level of stereopsis was assessed before and after prismatic correction. Patient satisfaction was assessed with a telephone follow-up survey. The mean age of the 30 patients was 29.7 ± 10.3 years (range 14-52). All patients complained about uncrossed diplopia, only at distance. The esophoria was concomitant in all cases ranging from 12 to 60 prism diopters (PD) at distance (mean 35.80 ± 14.17) and from 10 to 46 PD at near (mean 26.23 ± 11.46) (t = 6.51, <.001). Cycloplegic spherical-equivalent refraction averaged -5.25 ± 1.67 D (range -0.50 to -8.13), 28 patients were myopic and 2 were emmetropic, all did not wear glasses for near work. All patients received brain and orbital computed tomography scans and magnetic resonance imaging and, in some cases, neurological examinations were performed. All of these examinations were normal. In 27 out of 30 patients treated with prisms, the diplopia resolved, whereas three patients were not satisfied with prismatic correction and underwent surgery. With prisms the esophoria was concomitant, ranging from 6 to 23 PD at distance fixation and from 4 to 18 PD at near fixation. Out of 30 patients, 23 patients were satisfied, 3 patients were not satisfied because their vision remained uncomfortable and 4 patients had an intermediate score. AACE was characterized by a sudden onset of concomitant non-accommodative esotropia with diplopia or visual confusion. In most cases, prismatic correction had a favorable effect with a resolution of diplopia. It offers a good treatment alternative in the early stage, when the angle of strabismus is unstable and surgery is not without risk.
急性后天性共同性内斜视(AACE)是内斜视的一种独特亚型。本回顾性研究的目的是描述其临床特征,讨论诊断和治疗管理,并评估棱镜治疗的效果。回顾了2015年8月至2018年11月在中部战区总医院出现急性复视的30例患者的病历。所有患者均接受了完整的病史、眼科和视光学检查,以及脑部和眼眶影像学检查。对患者进行了2至8个月的随访(平均3.9±1.2个月)。分析了斜视角度、屈光不正、立体视以及棱镜治疗结果。在棱镜矫正前后评估立体视水平。通过电话随访调查评估患者满意度。30例患者的平均年龄为29.7±10.3岁(范围14 - 52岁)。所有患者均主诉仅在远距离时有非交叉性复视。所有病例的内隐斜均为共同性,远距离时为12至60棱镜度(PD)(平均35.80±14.17),近距离时为10至46 PD(平均26.23±11.46)(t = 6.51,P <.001)。睫状肌麻痹后的等效球镜平均为 -5.25±1.67 D(范围 -0.50至 -8.13),28例患者为近视,2例为正视,所有患者近距离工作时均不戴眼镜。所有患者均接受了脑部和眼眶计算机断层扫描及磁共振成像检查,部分患者还进行了神经学检查。所有这些检查均正常。在接受棱镜治疗的30例患者中,27例复视消失,而3例患者对棱镜矫正不满意并接受了手术。使用棱镜时,内隐斜为共同性,远距离注视时为6至23 PD,近距离注视时为4至18 PD。30例患者中,23例满意,3例不满意是因为视力仍感不适,4例为中等评分。AACE的特征是突然出现共同性非调节性内斜视并伴有复视或视觉混淆。在大多数情况下,棱镜矫正对复视的消除有良好效果。在斜视角度不稳定且手术并非没有风险的早期阶段,它提供了一种良好的治疗选择。