Drug Safety Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., La Jolla, CA 92121, United States of America.
Sanofi, R&D Preclinical Safety, Industriepark Höchst, 65926 Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2020 Sep;105:106869. doi: 10.1016/j.vascn.2020.106869. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
Secondary pharmacological profiling is increasingly applied in pharmaceutical drug discovery to address unwanted pharmacological side effects of drug candidates before entering the clinic. Regulators, drug makers and patients share a demand for deep characterization of secondary pharmacology effects of novel drugs and their metabolites. The scope of such profiling has therefore expanded substantially in the past two decades, leading to the implementation of broad in silico profiling methods and focused in vitro off-target screening panels, to identify liabilities, but also opportunities, as early as possible. The pharmaceutical industry applies such panels at all stages of drug discovery routinely up to early development. Nevertheless, target composition, screening technologies, assay formats, interpretation and scheduling of panels can vary significantly between companies in the absence of dedicated guidelines. To contribute towards best practices in secondary pharmacology profiling, this review aims to summarize the state-of-the art in this field. Considerations are discussed with respect to panel design, screening strategy, implementation and interpretation of the data, including regulatory perspectives. The cascaded, or integrated, use of in silico and off-target profiling allows to exploit synergies for comprehensive safety assessment of drug candidates.
二次药理学特征分析在药物发现中应用越来越广泛,旨在解决候选药物进入临床前的不良药理学副作用问题。监管机构、制药商和患者都要求对新药及其代谢物的二次药理学作用进行深入的特征分析。因此,在过去的二十年中,这种特征分析的范围大大扩展,导致广泛的基于计算机的特征分析方法和有针对性的体外非靶标筛选面板的实施,以便尽早确定风险因素,同时也能发现机会。制药行业在药物发现的各个阶段都常规地应用这些筛选面板,直至早期开发阶段。然而,由于缺乏专门的指南,各公司之间在靶标组成、筛选技术、检测方法、面板的解释和安排方面存在显著差异。为了促进二次药理学特征分析的最佳实践,本综述旨在总结该领域的最新进展。讨论了考虑因素,包括面板设计、筛选策略、数据的实施和解释,以及监管方面。基于计算机和非靶标特征分析的级联或集成使用,可以为候选药物的全面安全评估利用协同作用。