Suppr超能文献

蝶腭神经节阻滞治疗硬脊膜穿破后头痛:一项随机、盲法、临床试验。

Sphenopalatine ganglion block for the treatment of postdural puncture headache: a randomised, blinded, clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Copenhagen Centre for Translational Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Anaesthesia, Juliane Marie Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2020 Jun;124(6):739-747. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.02.025. Epub 2020 Apr 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current treatment of postdural puncture headache includes epidural blood patch (EBP), which is invasive and may result in rare but severe complications. Sphenopalatine ganglion block is suggested as a simple, minimally invasive treatment for postdural puncture headache. We aimed to investigate the analgesic effect of a transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion block with local anaesthetic vs saline.

METHODS

We conducted a blinded, randomised clinical trial including adults fulfilling the criteria for EBP. Participants received a sphenopalatine ganglion block bilaterally with 1 ml of either local anaesthetic (lidocaine 4% and ropivacaine 0.5%) or placebo (saline). Primary outcome was pain in upright position 30 min post-block, measured on a 0-100 mm VAS.

RESULTS

We randomised 40 patients with an upright median pain intensity of 74 and 84 mm in the local anaesthetic and placebo groups at baseline, respectively. At 30 min after sphenopalatine ganglion block, the median pain intensity in upright position was 26 mm in the local anaesthetic group vs 37 mm in the placebo group (estimated median difference: 5 mm; 95% confidence interval: -14 to 21; P=0.53). In the local anaesthetic group, 50% required an EBP compared with 45% in the placebo group (P=0.76).

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of a sphenopalatine ganglion block with local anaesthetic had no statistically significant effect on pain intensity after 30 min compared with placebo. However, pain was reduced and EBP was avoided in half the patients of both groups, which suggests a major effect not necessarily attributable to local anaesthetics.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03652714.

摘要

背景

目前治疗硬脊膜穿破后头痛的方法包括硬膜外血贴(EBP),但这种方法具有侵入性,可能导致罕见但严重的并发症。蝶腭神经节阻滞被认为是一种简单、微创的治疗硬脊膜穿破后头痛的方法。我们旨在研究局部麻醉剂与生理盐水行蝶腭神经节阻滞的镇痛效果。

方法

我们进行了一项盲法、随机临床试验,纳入符合 EBP 标准的成年人。参与者双侧行蝶腭神经节阻滞,分别注射 1ml 局部麻醉剂(4%利多卡因和 0.5%罗哌卡因)或安慰剂(生理盐水)。主要结局为阻滞 30 分钟后直立位疼痛,采用 0-100mm VAS 进行评估。

结果

我们共纳入 40 名患者,基线时直立位疼痛中位数分别为局部麻醉剂组 74mm 和安慰剂组 84mm。蝶腭神经节阻滞 30 分钟后,直立位疼痛中位数在局部麻醉剂组为 26mm,安慰剂组为 37mm(估计中位数差值:5mm;95%置信区间:-14 至 21;P=0.53)。在局部麻醉剂组,50%的患者需要行 EBP,安慰剂组为 45%(P=0.76)。

结论

与安慰剂相比,局部麻醉剂行蝶腭神经节阻滞 30 分钟后对疼痛强度无统计学显著影响。然而,两组各有一半的患者疼痛减轻且避免了 EBP,这表明可能存在并非完全归因于局部麻醉剂的主要作用。

临床试验注册

NCT03652714。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验