• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

产科安全指标预防低危分娩中的医院伤害:范围综述方案。

Obstetrical safety indicators for preventing hospital harms in low risk births: a scoping review protocol.

机构信息

Better Outcomes & Registry Network (BORN) Ontario, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario - Ottawa Children's Treatment Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Apr 16;10(4):e036203. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036203.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036203
PMID:32303516
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7200041/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Optimising the safety of obstetric patient care is a primary concern for many hospitals. Performance indicators measuring aspects of patient care processes can lead to improvements in health systems and the prevention of harm to the patient. We present our protocol for a scoping review to identify indicators for obstetric safety in low risk births. We aim to identify indicators addressing preventable hospital harms, to summarise the data and synthesise results.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will use methods described by Arksey and O'Malley and further expanded by Levac . We will search electronic databases such as Medline, Embase, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library, and websites from professional bodies and other organisations, using an iterative search strategy.Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts of search results to determine eligibility for inclusion. If eligibility is not clear, the reviewers will screen the full text version. If reviewers' decisions regarding eligibility differ, a third reviewer will review the record. Two reviewers will independently extract data from records that meet our inclusion criteria using a standardised data collection form. We will narratively describe quantitative data, such as the frequency with which indicators are identified, and conduct a thematic analysis of the qualitative data. We will compile a comprehensive list of patient safety indicators and organise them according to concepts that best suit the data such as the Donabedian model or the Hospital Harm Framework. We will discuss the implications for future research, clinical practice and policy-making. We will report the conduct of the review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews checklist.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The sources of information included in this scoping review will be available to the public. Therefore, ethics approval is not warranted. We will disseminate results in a peer-reviewed publication, conference/event presentation(s) and stakeholder communications.

摘要

简介

优化产科患者护理安全是许多医院的首要关注点。衡量患者护理流程各个方面的绩效指标可以改善卫生系统并防止患者受到伤害。我们提出了一项范围综述的方案,以确定低危分娩中产科安全的指标。我们旨在确定针对可预防的医院伤害的指标,总结数据并综合结果。

方法和分析

我们将使用 Arksey 和 O'Malley 以及 Levac 进一步扩展的方法。我们将使用迭代搜索策略,搜索电子数据库,如 Medline、Embase、CINAHL 和 Cochrane 图书馆,以及专业机构和其他组织的网站。两位评审员将独立筛选搜索结果的标题和摘要,以确定是否符合纳入标准。如果资格不明确,评审员将筛选全文版本。如果评审员对资格的决定存在分歧,将由第三位评审员审查记录。两位评审员将独立使用标准化数据收集表从符合纳入标准的记录中提取数据。我们将对定量数据(例如指标识别的频率)进行叙述性描述,并对定性数据进行主题分析。我们将编制一份全面的患者安全指标清单,并根据最适合数据的概念(如 Donabedian 模型或医院伤害框架)对其进行组织。我们将讨论对未来研究、临床实践和决策制定的影响。我们将使用扩展的系统评价和荟萃分析扩展的首选报告项目清单报告综述的实施情况。

伦理和传播

本范围综述中包含的信息来源将对公众开放。因此,不需要伦理批准。我们将在同行评议的出版物、会议/活动报告和利益相关者沟通中传播研究结果。

相似文献

1
Obstetrical safety indicators for preventing hospital harms in low risk births: a scoping review protocol.产科安全指标预防低危分娩中的医院伤害:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Apr 16;10(4):e036203. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036203.
2
Quality indicators for substance use disorder care: a scoping review protocol.物质使用障碍护理的质量指标:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 29;15(3):e085216. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085216.
3
Harm reduction for perinatal cannabis use: protocol for a scoping review of clinical practices.围产期大麻使用的危害减少:临床实践范围审查方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 10;14(12):e090453. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090453.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Gender-sensitive and intersectionality-informed health indicators for health reporting: a scoping review protocol.用于健康报告的对性别问题有敏感认识和考虑到交叉问题的健康指标:范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 9;14(11):e091549. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091549.
6
Using an integrated knowledge translation or other research partnership approach in trainee-led research: a scoping review protocol.采用知识转化综合模式或其他研究合作模式进行以学员为主导的研究:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 25;11(5):e043756. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043756.
7
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
8
A scoping review protocol on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals.一项关于生物医学期刊稿件评审过程中同行评审员角色和任务的范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 22;7(10):e017468. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017468.
9
Mapping evidence of food safety at transport stations in Africa: a scoping review protocol.非洲交通站点食品安全证据图谱:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 11;10(8):e035879. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035879.
10
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.

引用本文的文献

1
Intravenous immunoglobulin G therapy for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia.静脉注射免疫球蛋白 G 治疗新生儿高胆红素血症。
Pediatr Res. 2023 Dec;94(6):2092-2097. doi: 10.1038/s41390-023-02712-0. Epub 2023 Jul 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of a maternal newborn audit and feedback system in Ontario: a collective case study.安大略省使用母婴审计和反馈系统:一项集体案例研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Aug;28(8):635-644. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008354. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
2
How to be a very safe maternity unit: An ethnographic study.如何成为一个非常安全的产科病房:一项民族志研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Feb;223:64-72. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.035. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
3
Indicators for monitoring maternal and neonatal quality care: a systematic review.监测母婴优质护理的指标:系统评价。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Jan 11;19(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2173-2.
4
Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach.系统评价或范围综述?在选择系统评价或范围综述方法时,作者的指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x.
5
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
6
Patient safety initiatives in obstetrics: a rapid review.产科患者安全倡议:快速综述
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 6;8(7):e020170. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020170.
7
Reducing Maternal Mortality and Severe Maternal Morbidity Through State-based Quality Improvement Initiatives.通过基于州的质量改进举措降低孕产妇死亡率和严重孕产妇发病率。
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;61(2):319-331. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000361.
8
Effect of a population-level performance dashboard intervention on maternal-newborn outcomes: an interrupted time series study.人群水平绩效仪表板干预对母婴结局的影响:一项中断时间序列研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Jun;27(6):425-436. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007361. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
9
A mixed methods evaluation of the maternal-newborn dashboard in Ontario: dashboard attributes, contextual factors, and facilitators and barriers to use: a study protocol.安大略省母婴仪表盘的混合方法评估:仪表盘属性、背景因素以及使用的促进因素和障碍:一项研究方案
Implement Sci. 2016 May 4;11:59. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0427-1.
10
Obstetric Safety and Quality.产科安全与质量
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;126(1):196-206. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000918.