Meta-analysis of randomised trials compares mortality after transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement.
作者信息
Vendrik J, Baan J
机构信息
Heart Centre, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (location AMC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
出版信息
Neth Heart J. 2020 Jun;28(6):309-311. doi: 10.1007/s12471-020-01418-w.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Meta-analysis of randomised trials compares mortality after transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术术后死亡率的随机试验荟萃分析
Neth Heart J. 2020 Jun;28(6):309-311. doi: 10.1007/s12471-020-01418-w.
2
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement is Associated with Comparable Clinical Outcomes to Open Aortic Valve Surgery but with a Reduced Length of In-Patient Hospital Stay: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Trials.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与开放性主动脉瓣手术的临床结局相当，但住院时间缩短：一项随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Heart Lung Circ. 2017 Mar;26(3):285-295. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2016.07.011. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
3
Meta-analysis of transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low surgical risk.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗低手术风险患者的荟萃分析。
EuroIntervention. 2019 Dec 20;15(12):e1047-e1056. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00663.
4
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术：随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Dec 1;224:382-387. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.09.018. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
5
Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low surgical risk: A meta-analysis of randomized trials and propensity score matched observational studies.低手术风险患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较：随机试验和倾向评分匹配观察性研究的荟萃分析
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Aug 1;92(2):408-416. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27518. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
6
Comparison of late mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement: Insights from a meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术后晚期死亡率的比较：一项荟萃分析的见解
Eur J Intern Med. 2017 May;40:43-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2017.01.023. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
7
Transcatheter vs. surgical aortic valve replacement and medical treatment : Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized trials.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术及药物治疗：随机和非随机试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
Herz. 2018 Jun;43(4):325-337. doi: 10.1007/s00059-017-4562-5. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
8
Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术在低危患者中的比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Sep 24;74(12):1532-1540. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.06.076.
9
Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Meta-Analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗慢性肾脏病患者的比较：一项荟萃分析。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019 Aug;33(8):2221-2230. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.12.010. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
10
A comprehensive review of the PARTNER trial.对 PARTNER 试验的全面回顾。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Mar;145(3 Suppl):S11-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.11.051.
引用本文的文献
1
Major threats to early safety after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in a contemporary cohort of real-world patients.当代真实世界患者经导管主动脉瓣植入术后早期安全性的主要威胁。
Neth Heart J. 2021 Dec;29(12):632-642. doi: 10.1007/s12471-021-01638-8. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
本文引用的文献
1
Mortality after transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement: an updated meta-analysis of randomised trials.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术后的死亡率：随机试验的最新荟萃分析。
Neth Heart J. 2020 Jun;28(6):320-333. doi: 10.1007/s12471-020-01378-1.
2
Long-Term Durability of Transcatheter Heart Valves: Insights From Bench Testing to 25 Years.经导管心脏瓣膜的长期耐久性：从 bench 测试到 25 年的观察结果
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jan 27;13(2):235-249. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.07.049. Epub 2019 Sep 28.
3
Pacemaker dependency after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: incidence, predictors and long-term outcomes.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后起搏器依赖：发生率、预测因素和长期结局。
EuroIntervention. 2019 Nov 20;15(10):875-883. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01060.
4
Current results and remaining challenges of trans-catheter aortic valve replacement expansion in intermediate and low risk patients.经导管主动脉瓣置换术在中低风险患者中的当前结果及尚存挑战
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2019 May 15;23:100375. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2019.100375. eCollection 2019 Jun.
5
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Balloon-Expandable Valve in Low-Risk Patients.经皮球囊扩张式主动脉瓣置换术治疗低危患者。
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1695-1705. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1814052. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
6
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Valve in Low-Risk Patients.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗低危患者的自膨式瓣膜。
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1706-1715. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1816885. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
7
The Vancouver 3M (Multidisciplinary, Multimodality, But Minimalist) Clinical Pathway Facilitates Safe Next-Day Discharge Home at Low-, Medium-, and High-Volume Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Centers: The 3M TAVR Study.温哥华 3M（多学科、多模式但简约）临床路径促进低、中、高容量经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换中心安全次日出院：3M TAVR 研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Mar 11;12(5):459-469. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.12.020.
8
Optimising patient discharge management after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the multicentre European FAST-TAVI trial.经股动脉主动脉瓣置换术后患者出院管理的优化：多中心欧洲 FAST-TAVI 试验。
EuroIntervention. 2019 Jun 20;15(2):147-154. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01197.
9
Five-Year Clinical and Echocardiographic Outcomes From the NOTION Randomized Clinical Trial in Patients at Lower Surgical Risk.NOTION 低手术风险患者随机临床试验的五年临床和超声心动图结果
Circulation. 2019 Jun 11;139(24):2714-2723. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036606. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
10
Comparison of balloon-expandable vs. self-expandable valves in patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation: from the CENTER-collaboration.经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣植入术中球囊扩张瓣与自膨式瓣的比较：来自 CENTER 合作研究。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Feb 1;40(5):456-465. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy805.
Zotero 插件