Rubin J, Richards W A
Natural Computation Group, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge 02139.
J Opt Soc Am A. 1988 Dec;5(12):2045-9. doi: 10.1364/josaa.5.002045.
There are countless three-dimensional interpretations of a set of points moving in a two-dimensional image. A unique visual interpretation of motion thus requires assumptions about the types of structure likely to be found in the three-dimensional world. We propose that the human visual system favors articulated structures in its interpretations. An articulated structure is a rigid body with moving parts that themselves are rigid and rotate in fixed planes with respect to the body. (A bicycle is an example.) We claim that an image consisting of just two moving points is seen as an articulated structure (when their motion is consistent with one), even though countless other interpretations are possible, including a rigid one of a rod moving in space. An experiment is presented in support of our claim, and a well-known display from an old experiment is reinterpreted as a special case of an articulated structure.
对于在二维图像中移动的一组点,存在无数种三维解释。因此,对运动进行独特的视觉解释需要对三维世界中可能存在的结构类型做出假设。我们提出,人类视觉系统在其解释中倾向于有关节的结构。有关节的结构是一种刚体,其运动部件本身是刚性的,并且相对于主体在固定平面内旋转。(自行车就是一个例子。)我们声称,仅由两个移动点组成的图像被视为一种有关节的结构(当它们的运动与之相符时),尽管还存在无数其他可能的解释,包括一根在空间中移动的刚性杆的解释。本文给出了一个实验来支持我们的观点,并且一个来自旧实验的著名展示被重新解释为有关节结构的一个特殊情况。