Suppr超能文献

使用风险分层工具指导无症状性镜下血尿患者的评估。

Use of a Risk Stratification Tool to Guide Evaluation of Patients With Asymptomatic Microscopic Hematuria.

机构信息

Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY; Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY.

Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY; Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY.

出版信息

Urology. 2020 Jul;141:27.e1-27.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.03.045. Epub 2020 Apr 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if use of the hematuria risk index can reduce testing and cost, while maintaining equivalent lesion detection in patients with asymptomatic microscopic hematuria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of 1049 patients at single institution. Hematuria risk index score was calculated based on clinical factors including age, sex, smoking history, and degree of hematuria for each patient along with evaluation studies performed and total number of tumors discovered. Cost benefit analysis was performed based on published Medicare averages.

RESULTS

Tumor detection rate in overall, low-risk, and moderate-risk groups were 1.2%, 0%, and 2.96% at a total cost of $408,376. When low-risk group is not screened cost decreases to $166,252 with no lesions missed. The cost to discover one lesion/cancer in the overall group was $34,031.3, the cost to find one high-grade clinically significant lesion/cancer was $136,125.3 for the overall group. When the low-risk group was removed, the cost to find a high-grade clinically significant lesion/cancer decreased to $55,417.3 without missing any significant lesions. Ultrasound may be utilized instead of computed tomography with minimal loss of lesion detection in select moderate risk patients.

CONCLUSION

None of the low-risk hematuria risk patients were diagnosed with any lesions, as such these patients may not need an evaluation. Furthermore, by utilizing a risk-stratified approach to the assessment of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria health care costs can be significantly decreased with limited negative consequences in terms of lesion detection.

摘要

目的

确定血尿风险指数的使用是否可以减少检测和成本,同时保持无症状性镜下血尿患者的同等病变检出率。

材料和方法

对单中心的 1049 例患者进行回顾性队列研究。根据每位患者的临床因素(包括年龄、性别、吸烟史和血尿程度)以及进行的评估研究和发现的肿瘤总数,计算血尿风险指数评分。根据公布的医疗保险平均数据进行成本效益分析。

结果

在总人群、低危人群和中危人群中,肿瘤检出率分别为 1.2%、0%和 2.96%,总费用为 408376 美元。当不筛查低危人群时,费用降至 166252 美元,且无病变遗漏。在总人群中,发现一个病变/癌症的成本为 34031.3 美元,发现一个高级别临床显著病变/癌症的成本为 136125.3 美元。当排除低危人群时,在不遗漏任何高级别临床显著病变的情况下,发现高级别临床显著病变的成本降至 55417.3 美元。在选择的中危患者中,超声检查可以替代计算机断层扫描,而不会降低病变检出率。

结论

所有低危血尿风险患者均未诊断出任何病变,因此这些患者可能不需要评估。此外,通过采用风险分层方法评估无症状性镜下血尿,可以显著降低医疗保健成本,而在病变检出方面的负面影响有限。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验