Chen J W, Chang W J, Zhang Z Y, He G D, Feng Q Y, Zhu D X, Yi T, Lin Q, Wei Y, Xu J M
Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 25;23(4):364-369. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20200212-00052.
To investigate the risk factors associated with anastomotic leakage after robotic surgery in mid-low rectal cancer. A retrospective case-control study method was conducted. Inclusion criteria: (1) 18 to 80 years old; (2) pathologically confirmed rectal cancer; (3) distance <10 cm from tumor to anal margin; (4) robotic anterior rectal resection. Patients with previous history of colorectal cancer surgery, distant metastases or other malignant tumors, undergoing emergency surgery, with severe abdominal adhesions or those receiving combined organ resection were excluded. Based on the above criteria, 636 patients undergoing robotic radical sphincter-preserving surgery for mid-low rectal cancer in Zhongshan Hospital from January 2015 to December 2018 were included in this study, including 398 males (62.6%) and 238 females (37.4%) with a mean age of (61.9±11.3) years. Sixty-eight cases (10.7%) received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Amony the 636 included patients, 123(19.3%) underwent natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) and 15 (2.3%) underwent preventive stoma. According to the cirteria developed by the International Rectal Cancer Research Group in 2010, the anastomotic leakage was classified as grade A (no requirement of intervention), B (requirement of intervention), and C (requirement of operation). Logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between anastomotic leakage and clinicopathological factors. Factors in univariate analysis with <0.05 were included in the multivariate analysis. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 38 cases (6.0%). The grading of anastomotic leakage was grade A in 13 cases (2.0%), grade B in 19 cases (3.0%), and grade C in 6 cases (0.9%). The 3-year disease-free survival rate of patients with anastomotic leakage and without anastomotic leakage was 83.5% and 83.6% respectively (=0.862); the 3-year overall survival rate of the two group was 85.1% and 87.5% respectively (=0.296). The results of univariate logistic regression analysis showed that male (=0.011), longer operation time (=0.042), distance ≤5 cm from tumor to anal margin (=0.012), more intraoperative blood loss (=0.048) were associated with anastomotic leakage (all <0.05). NOSES was not associated with anastomotic leakage (=0.704). Multivariate analysis confirmed that male (OR=3.03, 95%CI: 1.37 to 7.14, =0.010), operation time ≥180 minutes (OR=2.04, 95%CI: 1.03 to 3.99, =0.040), distance ≤5 cm from tumor to anal margin (OR=2.56, 95%CI:1.28 to 5.26, =0.008) were independent risk factors for anastomotic leakage. Male, short distance from tumor to anal margin, and long operation time are independent risk factors for anastomotic leakage in patients undergoing robotic mid-low rectal cancer radical surgeries. These patients need to be cautiously treated during surgery.
探讨中低位直肠癌机器人手术后吻合口漏的相关危险因素。采用回顾性病例对照研究方法。纳入标准:(1)年龄18至80岁;(2)经病理确诊为直肠癌;(3)肿瘤距肛缘距离<10 cm;(4)机器人辅助直肠前切除术。排除既往有结直肠癌手术史、远处转移或其他恶性肿瘤、接受急诊手术、有严重腹部粘连或接受联合器官切除的患者。根据上述标准,本研究纳入了2015年1月至2018年12月在中山医院接受机器人辅助中低位直肠癌根治性保肛手术的636例患者,其中男性398例(62.6%),女性238例(37.4%),平均年龄(61.9±11.3)岁。68例(10.7%)接受了新辅助放化疗。在纳入的636例患者中,123例(19.3%)接受了经自然腔道标本取出手术(NOSES),15例(2.3%)接受了预防性造口术。根据国际直肠癌研究组2010年制定的标准,吻合口漏分为A级(无需干预)、B级(需要干预)和C级(需要手术)。采用Logistic回归分析吻合口漏与临床病理因素之间的关系。单因素分析中P<0.05的因素纳入多因素分析。吻合口漏发生38例(6.0%)。吻合口漏分级为A级13例(2.0%),B级19例(3.0%),C级6例(0.9%)。有吻合口漏和无吻合口漏患者的3年无病生存率分别为83.5%和83.6%(P=0.862);两组的3年总生存率分别为85.1%和87.5%(P=0.296)。单因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,男性(P=0.011)、手术时间较长(P=0.042)、肿瘤距肛缘距离≤5 cm(P=0.012)、术中出血量较多(P=0.048)与吻合口漏相关(均P<0.05)。NOSES与吻合口漏无关(P=0.704)。多因素分析证实,男性(OR=3.03,95%CI:1.37至7.14,P=0.010)、手术时间≥180分钟(OR=2.04,95%CI:1.03至3.99,P=0.040)、肿瘤距肛缘距离≤5 cm(OR=2.56,95%CI:1.28至5.26,P=0.008)是吻合口漏的独立危险因素。男性、肿瘤距肛缘距离短和手术时间长是接受机器人辅助中低位直肠癌根治手术患者吻合口漏的独立危险因素。这些患者在手术过程中需要谨慎处理。