[The comparison of malleostapedotomy in primary and revision stapes surgery for otosclerosis].

To compare the effectiveness of primary malleostapedotomy with revision malleostapedotomy for otosclerosis. From April 2002 to December 2017, 70 consecutive patients with otosclerosis who underwent malleostapedotomy were reviewed. Depending on the primary malleostapedotomy (P-MS) or revision malleostapedotomy (R-MS), the patients were divided into P-MS group or R-MS group.The intraoperative findings and hearing results before and after surgery were compared between the two groups. ALL data were analyzed using SPSS 23. Totally 73 malleostapedotomy were performed in 73 ears of 70 patients, including 38 P-MS and 35 R-MS. There was no significant difference between the two groups in sex ratio, age and operated ears (0.05 for all). The most common finding at P-MS was incus fixation (50.0%, 19/38) versus prosthesis displacement for R-MS (60.0%, 21/35) . Overall, the air-bone gap (ABG) improvement in P-MS were (18.1±8.2) dB in 0.5-3 kHz and (18.3±8.5) dB in 0.5-4 kHz, without significant difference to those in R-MS (0.05) . 31.4% of R-MS in 0.5-3 kHz and 22.9% R-MS in 0.5-4 kHz achieved an ABG<10 dB, significantly lower than those of P-MS (65.8% in 0.5-3 kHz and 57.9% in 0.5-4kHz; 0.05). Failure (postoperative ABG>30 dB) occurred in 11.4% in R-MS and 0 in P-MS (for 0.5-3 kHz and 0.5-4 kHz). The incidence of postoperative sensorineural hearing loss (>10 dB increase in bone conduct) in R-MS group was 8.6% in 0.5-3 kHz and 0.5-4 kHz, without significant difference to those in P-MS (0.05) . 80.0% (20/25) of first R-MS achieved ABG<20 dB, compared to 37.5% (3/8) of second R-MS with ABG<20 dB. Although both P-MS and R-MS can significantly improve hearing, with similar risk of inner ear damage, R-MS is less effective and poses a higher risk of failure than P-MS. For patients with insufficient hearing improvement after first R-MS, conventional hearing aids or implantable hearing devices may be considered as an alternative.