International Master program in Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Present Address: Royal Centre for Disease Control, Department of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Thimphu, Bhutan.
BMC Public Health. 2020 Apr 19;20(1):533. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08666-w.
Direct observed treatment (DOT) has been implemented in Bhutan since 1997 and currently, it is offered in various model of delivery including a combination of hospital based, home based DOT and ambulatory DOT. Overall, treatment success rate for tuberculosis cases is higher than the global target; however, it is still need to be improved. Evaluation to the implementation fidelity of DOT is important to identify potential rooms for improvement. This study aimed to assess two major components of the program's implementation fidelity: to assess patient's adherence to DOT and explore factors for adherence; to assess provider's compliance with DOT guideline and explore factors for compliance.
This research used a sequential explanatory mixed method. The conceptual framework of implementation fidelity was adopted to guide this study design. The cross-sectional study of TB patients was enrolled in two hospitals with highest TB load, between September to November 2017 in Bhutan. Interviewer assisted survey was conducted with 139 TB patients who visited the hospital in continuation phase. In-depth interview was then conducted with nine TB patients and four health staffs to explore the barriers and enablers of DOT.
Total of 61.9% (86/139) of patients has received DOT at intensive phase. Proportion was higher among MDR-TB cases (100%), and smear sputum positive TB cases (84.7%). In the continuation phase, 5.8% of patients took medicine at hospital, 48.9% at home and the rest 45.3% no longer practiced DOT. More than 90% of patient received correct dosage and standard regimen of anti-TB drugs according to the guideline. The key factors affecting poor adherence to DOT as perceived by patients were; lack of willingness to visit the clinic on daily basis due to long distance, financial implications and family support. However, patient's satisfaction to the quality of TB treatment service delivery was high (98.6%). Providing incentives to the patient was most agreed enabler felt by both health workers and patients.
In the selected hospital sites, the patient's adherence to DOT and provider's compliance with DOT guideline is partially implemented; the coverage and the duration of DOT is very low, therefore, need to revise and improve DOT model and structure.
自 1997 年以来,不丹一直在实施直接观察治疗(DOT),目前,它提供了各种交付模式,包括医院为基础、家庭为基础的 DOT 和门诊 DOT 的结合。总体而言,结核病病例的治疗成功率高于全球目标;然而,仍需加以改进。对 DOT 实施保真度的评估对于确定潜在的改进空间非常重要。本研究旨在评估该计划实施保真度的两个主要组成部分:评估患者对 DOT 的依从性并探索依从性的因素;评估提供者遵守 DOT 指南的情况并探索合规性的因素。
本研究采用了顺序解释性混合方法。采用实施保真度的概念框架指导本研究设计。2017 年 9 月至 11 月,在不丹结核病负担最高的两家医院对结核病患者进行了横断面研究。对正在继续治疗阶段就诊的 139 名结核病患者进行了访谈员辅助调查。然后对 9 名结核病患者和 4 名卫生工作人员进行深入访谈,以探讨 DOT 的障碍和促进因素。
共有 61.9%(86/139)的患者在强化期接受了 DOT。耐多药结核病(MDR-TB)病例的比例更高(100%),且痰涂片阳性结核病病例(84.7%)。在继续治疗阶段,5.8%的患者在医院服药,48.9%在家服药,其余 45.3%不再接受 DOT。根据指南,超过 90%的患者接受了正确的剂量和标准的抗结核药物治疗方案。患者认为影响 DOT 依从性差的主要因素是:由于距离远、经济影响和家庭支持,不愿意每天到诊所就诊。然而,患者对结核病治疗服务提供质量的满意度很高(98.6%)。向患者提供激励措施是卫生工作者和患者都最认同的促进因素。
在选定的医院,患者对 DOT 的依从性和提供者对 DOT 指南的依从性部分得到了实施;DOT 的覆盖范围和持续时间非常低,因此需要修改和改进 DOT 模式和结构。