• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估诊断为囊性纤维化患者的肝纤维化和炎症的选定参数。

Assessment of Selected Parameters of Liver Fibrosis and Inflammation in Patients with Diagnosed Cystic Fibrosis.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

Upper Silesian Child Health Centre, Katowice, Poland.

出版信息

Mediators Inflamm. 2020 Mar 25;2020:5696185. doi: 10.1155/2020/5696185. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1155/2020/5696185
PMID:32308556
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7132586/
Abstract

Changes in the liver and bile ducts observed in patients diagnosed with cystic fibrosis result from inflammatory processes as well as fibrosis, remodeling, apoptosis, and cholestasis. As a consequence, portal hypertension, cirrhosis, and hepatic failure may develop. So far, the complexity of these processes has not been elucidated. . The aim of the study was to evaluate the selected parameters of hepatitis and fibrosis (Fibrotest, Actitest, and APRI) in patients diagnosed with cystic fibrosis. . The study included 79 patients with cystic fibrosis, aged 1 to 20 years (mean age 9.8 years), 49 girls (62%) and 30 boys (38%). The analysis involved the following: age, sex, clinical manifestations, laboratory tests evaluating pancreas function, parameters of liver damage, and cholestasis. Fibrotest, Actitest, and APRI were performed in all subjects. . Elevated parameters of hepatic cell damage (hypertransaminasemia) were found in 31/79 (39.2%) patients, while abnormal cholestasis parameters in 21/79 (26.6%). The abnormal results of Fibrotest were reported in 15% of patients (12/79), while of Actitest in 10% (8/79). In contrast, elevated APRI values were found in only 7.6% (6/79) of subjects. There was a statistically significant correlation between APRI and age (higher values were observed in younger children) and between Fibrotest and Actitest and pancreatic insufficiency (higher values were found in subjects without this abnormality). Moreover, Fibrotest values were significantly higher in girls. There was no correlation between Fibrotest, Actitest, and APRI values and the type of mutation. . It appears that Fibrotest may be used as an early marker of liver fibrosis in patients with cystic fibrosis. Increased APRI values were only found in subjects with advanced hepatic lesions, most often in the form of portal hypertension.

摘要

在诊断为囊性纤维化的患者中观察到的肝脏和胆管变化是由炎症过程以及纤维化、重塑、细胞凋亡和胆汁淤积引起的。因此,可能会发展为门静脉高压、肝硬化和肝衰竭。到目前为止,这些过程的复杂性尚未阐明。。本研究的目的是评估诊断为囊性纤维化的患者的肝炎和纤维化的选定参数(Fibrotest、Actitest 和 APRI)。。该研究纳入了 79 名年龄在 1 至 20 岁(平均年龄 9.8 岁)的囊性纤维化患者,其中 49 名女孩(62%)和 30 名男孩(38%)。分析包括以下内容:年龄、性别、临床表现、评估胰腺功能的实验室检查、肝损伤和胆汁淤积的参数。所有患者均进行了 Fibrotest、Actitest 和 APRI 检查。31/79(39.2%)例患者出现肝损伤(高转氨酶血症)的参数升高,21/79(26.6%)例患者出现异常胆汁淤积参数。15%(12/79)的患者报告 Fibrotest 结果异常,10%(8/79)的患者报告 Actitest 结果异常。相反,仅在 7.6%(6/79)的受试者中发现 APRI 值升高。APRI 值与年龄呈统计学显著相关(年龄越小,值越高),Fibrotest 和 Actitest 与胰腺功能不全呈统计学显著相关(无此异常的患者值较高)。此外,Fibrotest 值在女孩中显著较高。Fibrotest、Actitest 和 APRI 值与突变类型之间无相关性。。似乎 Fibrotest 可作为囊性纤维化患者肝纤维化的早期标志物。仅在具有晚期肝损伤的受试者中发现升高的 APRI 值,最常见的形式是门静脉高压。

相似文献

1
Assessment of Selected Parameters of Liver Fibrosis and Inflammation in Patients with Diagnosed Cystic Fibrosis.评估诊断为囊性纤维化患者的肝纤维化和炎症的选定参数。
Mediators Inflamm. 2020 Mar 25;2020:5696185. doi: 10.1155/2020/5696185. eCollection 2020.
2
Assessment of Liver Fibrosis with the Use of Elastography in Paediatric Patients with Diagnosed Cystic Fibrosis.弹性成像技术在诊断为囊性纤维化的儿科患者中评估肝纤维化的应用。
Dis Markers. 2022 Mar 19;2022:4798136. doi: 10.1155/2022/4798136. eCollection 2022.
3
Does the mutation of the SERPINA1 gene contribute to liver damage and cholestasis in patients with diagnosed cystic fibrosis? preliminary study.SERPINA1基因的突变是否会导致已确诊的囊性纤维化患者出现肝损伤和胆汁淤积?初步研究。
Dev Period Med. 2015 Jan-Mar;19(1):92-7.
4
Noninvasive biomarkers FibroTest and ActiTest versus liver biopsy in chronic hepatitis C patients: the Middle East experience.慢性丙型肝炎患者中,非侵入性生物标志物FibroTest和ActiTest与肝活检的对比:中东地区的经验
Ann Gastroenterol. 2015 Apr-Jun;28(2):265-270.
5
Liver stiffness measurement in children using FibroScan: feasibility study and comparison with Fibrotest, aspartate transaminase to platelets ratio index, and liver biopsy.使用FibroScan对儿童进行肝脏硬度测量:可行性研究以及与Fibrotest、天冬氨酸转氨酶与血小板比值指数和肝活检的比较
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2007 Oct;45(4):443-50. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31812e56ff.
6
Performance of biomarkers FibroTest, ActiTest, SteatoTest, and NashTest in patients with severe obesity: meta analysis of individual patient data.严重肥胖患者中 FibroTest、ActiTest、SteatoTest 和 NashTest 生物标志物的性能:个体患者数据分析的荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e30325. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030325. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
7
Prospective noninvasive analysis of hepatic fibrosis in patients with Crohn's disease: correlation of transient elastography and laboratory-based markers.前瞻性非侵入性分析克罗恩病患者肝纤维化:瞬时弹性成像与基于实验室标志物的相关性。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Oct;23(10):923-30. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3283499252.
8
Impact of quality control accepted inter-laboratory variations on calculated Fibrotest/Actitest scores for the non-invasive biochemical assessment of liver fibrosis.质量控制认可的实验室间差异对用于肝纤维化无创生化评估的Fibrotest/Actitest评分计算结果的影响。
Clin Chim Acta. 2009 Nov;409(1-2):90-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2009.09.005. Epub 2009 Sep 10.
9
Intra-laboratory analytical variability of biochemical markers of fibrosis (Fibrotest) and activity (Actitest) and reference ranges in healthy blood donors.纤维化生化标志物(Fibrotest)和活性标志物(Actitest)在实验室内部的分析变异性及健康献血者的参考范围。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2004 Mar;42(3):323-33. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2004.058.
10
Aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio and fibrosis-4 as biomarkers in biopsy-validated pediatric cystic fibrosis liver disease.天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶与血小板比值及纤维化-4 作为肝活检证实的儿童囊性纤维化肝病的生物标志物。
Hepatology. 2015 Nov;62(5):1576-83. doi: 10.1002/hep.28016. Epub 2015 Sep 28.

本文引用的文献

1
An Exploration Into Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs Towards Risky Health Behaviours in a Paediatric Cystic Fibrosis Population.对儿科囊性纤维化患者群体中危险健康行为的知识、态度和信念的探索
Clin Med Insights Circ Respir Pulm Med. 2019 May 30;13:1179548419849427. doi: 10.1177/1179548419849427. eCollection 2019.
2
Phenotypic spectrum and genetic heterogeneity of cystic fibrosis in Sri Lanka.斯里兰卡囊性纤维化的表型谱和基因异质性
BMC Med Genet. 2019 May 24;20(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12881-019-0815-x.
3
Cystic Fibrosis-Related Liver Diseases: New Paradigm for Treatment Based on Pathophysiology.囊性纤维化相关肝病:基于病理生理学的治疗新范式
Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2016 Nov 30;8(5):113-116. doi: 10.1002/cld.583. eCollection 2016 Nov.
4
The emerging burden of liver disease in cystic fibrosis patients: A UK nationwide study.囊性纤维化患者中不断增加的肝脏疾病负担:一项英国全国性研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 4;14(4):e0212779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212779. eCollection 2019.
5
Modifier genes in cystic fibrosis-related liver disease.囊性纤维化相关肝病的修饰基因。
Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2019 Mar;35(2):88-92. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000508.
6
Analysis of a large cohort of cystic fibrosis patients with severe liver disease indicates lung function decline does not significantly differ from that of the general cystic fibrosis population.对大量患有严重肝脏疾病的囊性纤维化患者进行分析表明,其肺功能下降与普通囊性纤维化人群并无显著差异。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 11;13(10):e0205257. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205257. eCollection 2018.
7
Liver Disease in Cystic Fibrosis: Illuminating the Black Box.囊性纤维化中的肝脏疾病:揭开黑箱之谜。
Hepatology. 2019 Apr;69(4):1379-1381. doi: 10.1002/hep.30255. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
8
Significance of Non-Invasive Markers as Predictor of Esophageal Varices in Liver Cirrhosis.非侵入性标志物作为肝硬化食管静脉曲张预测指标的意义
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2017 Oct-Dec;56(208):412-6.
9
Liver disease in patients with cystic fibrosis.囊性纤维化患者的肝脏疾病
Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2018 May;34(3):146-151. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000432.
10
Diagnostic value of various noninvasive indexes in the diagnosis of chronic hepatic fibrosis.各种无创指标在慢性肝纤维化诊断中的诊断价值。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018 Jan;22(2):479-485. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201801_14198.