Dean Nathan C, Vines Caroline G, Rubin Jenna, Collingridge Dave S, Mankivsky Mark, Srivastava Raj, Jones Barbara E, Kuttler Kathryn G, Walker Missy, Jenson Nathan, Webb Brandon J, Allen Todd L, Haug Peter J
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2020 Mar 4;2019:353-362. eCollection 2019.
A real-time electronic CDS for pneumonia (ePNa) identifies possible pneumonia patients, measures severity and antimicrobial resistance risk, and then recommends disposition, antibiotics, and microbiology studies. Use is voluntary, and clinicians may modify treatment recommendations. ePNa was associated with lower mortality in emergency department (ED) patients versus usual care (Annals EM 66:511). We adapted ePNa for the Cerner EHR, and implemented it across Intermountain Healthcare EDs (Utah, USA) throughout 2018. We introduced ePNa through didactic, interactive presentations to ED clinicians; follow-up visits identified barriers and facilitators to use. Email reminded clinicians and answered questions. Hospital admitting clinicians encouraged ePNa use to smooth care transitions. Audit-and-feedback measured utilization, showing variations from best practice when ePNa and associated electronic order sets were not used. Use was initially low, but gradually increased especially at larger hospitals. A user-friendly interface, frequent reminders, audit-and- feedback, a user survey, a nurse educator, and local physician champions are additive towards implementation success.
一种用于肺炎的实时电子临床决策支持系统(ePNa)可识别可能患有肺炎的患者,评估病情严重程度和抗菌药物耐药风险,然后推荐治疗方案、抗生素使用及微生物学检查项目。使用是自愿的,临床医生可修改治疗建议。与常规治疗相比,ePNa可降低急诊科(ED)患者的死亡率(《急诊医学年鉴》66:511)。我们对适用于Cerner电子病历系统的ePNa进行了调整,并于2018年在美国犹他州山间医疗保健系统的各个急诊科实施。我们通过面向急诊科临床医生的教学性互动演示来介绍ePNa;随访发现了使用过程中的障碍和促进因素。通过电子邮件提醒临床医生并解答问题。医院住院部临床医生鼓励使用ePNa以实现平稳的护理过渡。审核与反馈措施对使用情况进行了评估,结果显示在未使用ePNa及相关电子医嘱集时与最佳实践存在差异。最初使用量较低,但逐渐增加,尤其是在较大的医院。用户友好界面、频繁提醒、审核与反馈、用户调查、护士教育工作者以及当地医生倡导者对实施成功均有促进作用。