• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Trends and characteristics of protected health information breaches in the United States.美国受保护健康信息泄露的趋势与特征
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2020 Mar 4;2019:1081-1090. eCollection 2019.
2
What caused the breach? An examination of use of information technology and health data breaches.是什么导致了违规行为?对信息技术使用和健康数据泄露的调查。
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2014 Oct 1;11(Fall):1h. eCollection 2014.
3
Cyberthreats: A primer for healthcare professionals.网络威胁:医疗专业人员入门指南。
Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Jun;68:179-185. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.04.001. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
4
Data breach locations, types, and associated characteristics among US hospitals.美国医院数据泄露地点、类型及相关特征。
Am J Manag Care. 2018 Feb;24(2):78-84.
5
Evaluation of Causes of Protected Health Information Breaches.评估保护健康信息泄露的原因。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Feb 1;179(2):265-267. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5295.
6
Physical security, HIPPA, and the HHS wall of shame.物理安全、《健康保险流通与责任法案》以及美国卫生与公众服务部的耻辱墙。
J Healthc Prot Manage. 2014;30(1):85-90.
7
Temporal Trends and Characteristics of Reportable Health Data Breaches, 2010-2017.2010-2017 年可报告健康数据泄露事件的时间趋势和特征。
JAMA. 2018 Sep 25;320(12):1282-1284. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.9222.
8
Providers face uphill battle on data breaches. Healthcare organizations need a new approach in dealing with this pervasive and costly problem.医疗服务提供者在数据泄露问题上面临着艰难的战斗。医疗保健机构需要一种新方法来应对这个普遍存在且代价高昂的问题。
Healthc Inform. 2013 Feb;30(1):52, 54, 56.
9
Mitigating the consequences of electronic health record data breaches for patients and healthcare workers.减轻电子健康记录数据泄露对患者和医护人员的影响。
Aust Health Rev. 2024 Feb;48(1):4-7. doi: 10.1071/AH23258.
10
Types of Information Compromised in Breaches of Protected Health Information.受保护健康信息泄露中受损的信息类型。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jan 21;172(2):159-160. doi: 10.7326/M19-1759. Epub 2019 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Potential Benefits of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) and Blockchain Technology in Dermatology.非同质化代币(NFT)与区块链技术在皮肤病学中的潜在益处
Dermatol Pract Concept. 2024 Jan 1;14(1):e2024061. doi: 10.5826/dpc.1401a61.
2
A Perceptron Mixture Model of Intrusion Detection for Safeguarding Electronic Health Record System.用于保障电子健康记录系统安全的入侵检测感知器混合模型。
Int Conf Netw Based Inf Syst. 2022;313:202-212. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-84913-9_18. Epub 2021 Aug 8.
3
Using a Machine Learning Algorithm to Predict Online Patient Portal Utilization: A Patient Engagement Study.使用机器学习算法预测在线患者门户的使用情况:一项患者参与度研究。
Online J Public Health Inform. 2022 Dec 18;14(1):e8. doi: 10.5210/ojphi.v14i1.12851. eCollection 2022.
4
Blockchain Personal Health Records: Systematic Review.区块链个人健康记录:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 13;23(4):e25094. doi: 10.2196/25094.

本文引用的文献

1
Health IT, hacking, and cybersecurity: national trends in data breaches of protected health information.健康信息技术、黑客攻击与网络安全:受保护健康信息数据泄露的全国趋势
JAMIA Open. 2018 Jun 11;1(1):15-19. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooy019. eCollection 2018 Jul.
2
Evaluation of Causes of Protected Health Information Breaches.评估保护健康信息泄露的原因。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Feb 1;179(2):265-267. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5295.
3
Data breach locations, types, and associated characteristics among US hospitals.美国医院数据泄露地点、类型及相关特征。
Am J Manag Care. 2018 Feb;24(2):78-84.
4
Security Techniques for the Electronic Health Records.电子健康记录的安全技术
J Med Syst. 2017 Aug;41(8):127. doi: 10.1007/s10916-017-0778-4. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
5
Hospital Risk of Data Breaches.医院数据泄露风险。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jun 1;177(6):878-880. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0336.
6
Electronic Health Records: Then, Now, and in the Future.电子健康记录:过去、现在与未来。
Yearb Med Inform. 2016 May 20;Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S48-61. doi: 10.15265/IYS-2016-s006.
7
Do electronic medical records improve quality of care? Yes.电子病历能提高医疗质量吗?能。
Can Fam Physician. 2015 Oct;61(10):846-7, 850-1.
8
Data breaches of protected health information in the United States.美国受保护健康信息的数据泄露事件。
JAMA. 2015 Apr 14;313(14):1471-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.2252.
9
Keeping personal health information safe: the importance of good data hygiene.保护个人健康信息安全:良好数据卫生的重要性。
JAMA. 2015 Apr 14;313(14):1424. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.2746.
10
Adoption of electronic health records in UK hospitals: lessons from the USA.英国医院采用电子健康记录:来自美国的经验教训。
Lancet. 2014 Jul 5;384(9937):8-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61099-0.

美国受保护健康信息泄露的趋势与特征

Trends and characteristics of protected health information breaches in the United States.

作者信息

Hossain Md Mahbub, Hong Y Alicia

机构信息

Department of Health Promotion and Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, TX.

Department of Health Administration and Policy, College of Health and Human Services, George Mason University, VA.

出版信息

AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2020 Mar 4;2019:1081-1090. eCollection 2019.

PMID:32308905
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7153056/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the data breaches incidents in the U.S. between 2010 and 2018, identify the characteristics of breaches involving more than a million records, and compare the changes before and after wide adoption of EHR in 2015.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Incidents of data breaches between 2010 to 2018 were retrieved from the Office of Civil Rights portal. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed to assess the trends and characteristics, and changes between states from 2015 to 2018 were assessed and mapped.

RESULTS

From 2010 to 2018, a total of 2,529 breaches affected 194.74 million individual records. Overall, 72.08% incidents involved healthcare providers; theft (32.94%) and hacking (22.7%) were major types of breaches. Large cases affecting more than a million records happened due to compromised internal structures and systems. After 2015, the magnitude of the data breaches has changed at varying levels in the U.S. states necessitating further research and actions.

摘要

目的

评估2010年至2018年美国的数据泄露事件,确定涉及超过100万条记录的泄露事件的特征,并比较2015年电子健康记录广泛采用前后的变化。

材料与方法

从民权办公室门户网站检索2010年至2018年的数据泄露事件。进行描述性统计分析以评估趋势和特征,并评估和绘制2015年至2018年各州之间的变化。

结果

2010年至2018年,共有2529起泄露事件影响了1.9474亿条个人记录。总体而言,72.08%的事件涉及医疗保健提供者;盗窃(32.94%)和黑客攻击(22.7%)是主要的泄露类型。影响超过100万条记录的重大事件是由于内部结构和系统受损所致。2015年之后,美国各州数据泄露的规模在不同程度上发生了变化,需要进一步研究和采取行动。