Department of Psychology.
Psychol Aging. 2020 Jun;35(4):459-472. doi: 10.1037/pag0000467. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
Recent meta-analyses reveal age-related declines in short-term memory (STM), working memory, associative memory, prospective memory, face memory, recognition, and recall. The present meta-analyses extend this work beyond predominantly laboratory-based tasks to a naturalistic phenomenon. are vivid autobiographical recollections for the circumstances in which one learns of a distinct event that may be surprising, emotional, or personally important (the ). The existing literature on aging and flashbulb memories includes inconsistent findings. The present meta-analyses included 16 studies ( = 1898) that examined flashbulb memory in nonclinical samples of younger adults (below age 40 years) and older adults (above age 60 years). Findings, after exclusion of an outlier, suggest a small-to-moderate age-related impairment in flashbulb memory scores ( = 14, Hedges' = -0.30, 95% CI [-0.45, -0.15], p < .001) that was not moderated by study characteristics. After exclusion of an outlier, older adults' flashbulb memories were also significantly less consistent across time than younger adults' ( = 7, Hedges' = -0.29, 95% CI [-0.47, -0.11], = .002). Secondary analyses investigated age-related differences in the presence and consistency of canonical categories of flashbulb memories and encoding and rehearsal variables associated with flashbulb memory formation and retention. Age-related differences were found only for consistency of memory for ongoing activity at the time of the reception event, favoring younger adults ( = 3, Hedges' = -0.40, 95% CI [-0.65, -0.15], = .002). Overall, these findings are consistent with age-related impairment in flashbulb memory formation and retention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
最近的荟萃分析揭示了与年龄相关的短期记忆 (STM)、工作记忆、联想记忆、前瞻性记忆、面孔记忆、识别和回忆能力下降。本荟萃分析将这项工作从主要基于实验室的任务扩展到自然现象。闪光灯记忆是对一个人学习到一个独特事件的情况的生动自传式回忆,这个事件可能是令人惊讶的、情绪化的或个人重要的 (闪光灯记忆事件)。关于衰老和闪光灯记忆的现有文献包括不一致的发现。本荟萃分析包括 16 项研究 (n = 1898),这些研究考察了非临床年轻成年人 (40 岁以下) 和老年人 (60 岁以上) 的闪光灯记忆。在排除异常值后,研究结果表明,闪光灯记忆得分与年龄相关的损害较小到中等 (d = 14,Hedges'g = -0.30,95%置信区间[-0.45,-0.15],p <.001),且不受研究特征的影响。在排除异常值后,老年人的闪光灯记忆在时间上也明显不如年轻人一致 (d = 7,Hedges'g = -0.29,95%置信区间[-0.47,-0.11],p =.002)。二次分析调查了与闪光灯记忆形成和保留相关的闪光灯记忆的存在和一致性以及编码和复述变量在年龄相关差异。只有在接收事件发生时正在进行的活动的记忆一致性方面发现了年龄相关的差异,这有利于年轻人 (d = 3,Hedges'g = -0.40,95%置信区间[-0.65,-0.15],p =.002)。总的来说,这些发现与闪光灯记忆形成和保留与年龄相关的损害一致。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。