• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

妊娠子宫颈剪切波弹性超声评估。

Shear-wave sonoelastographic assessment of cervix in pregnancy.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.

Department of Obstetrics and gynecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.

出版信息

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Nov;99(11):1458-1468. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13874. Epub 2020 May 15.

DOI:10.1111/aogs.13874
PMID:32311770
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in shear-wave sonoelastography (SWS) scores between the different parts of cervix, explore the association between the cervical SWS scores with cervical length and evaluate repeatability of the measurement of cervical SWS scores.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a prospective study performed in women with singleton pregnancy at 11-13 (n = 676), 16-20 (n = 364), 21-24 (n = 338) and 28-32 weeks (n = 304). The SWS scores were obtained at the inner, middle and external parts of the cervix, using a transvaginal ultrasound approach.

RESULTS

The SWS scores of the inner cervix were significantly higher than the measurements acquired at the middle and external parts (all P < .001). At 21-24 and 28-32 weeks, most regions of interest demonstrated a very weak positive correlation with cervical length (r = .125 to r = .299). In comparison with nulliparous women, parous women without prior preterm birth had higher SWS scores of the inner and middle parts of the cervix at 16-20 and 21-24 weeks. All regions of interest showed good intra- and inter-observer agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

The assessment of the cervical SWS scores is highly reproducible. The stiffness of the cervix demonstrates a gradient that decreases from the inner part to the external part and a very weak positive correlation with cervical length.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在探讨宫颈不同部位剪切波弹性成像(SWS)评分的差异,探讨宫颈 SWS 评分与宫颈长度的关系,并评估宫颈 SWS 评分测量的重复性。

材料和方法

这是一项在 11-13 周(n = 676)、16-20 周(n = 364)、21-24 周(n = 338)和 28-32 周(n = 304)单胎妊娠女性中进行的前瞻性研究。使用经阴道超声方法在宫颈内、中、外三部分获取 SWS 评分。

结果

宫颈内 SWS 评分明显高于中、外部分(均 P <.001)。在 21-24 周和 28-32 周,大多数感兴趣区域与宫颈长度呈非常弱的正相关(r =.125 至 r =.299)。与初产妇相比,无早产史的经产妇在 16-20 周和 21-24 周时宫颈内、中 SWS 评分较高。所有感兴趣区域的观察者内和观察者间一致性均较好。

结论

宫颈 SWS 评分的评估具有高度可重复性。宫颈的硬度呈梯度分布,从内部分到外部分逐渐降低,与宫颈长度呈非常弱的正相关。

相似文献

1
Shear-wave sonoelastographic assessment of cervix in pregnancy.妊娠子宫颈剪切波弹性超声评估。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Nov;99(11):1458-1468. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13874. Epub 2020 May 15.
2
Longitudinal evaluation of cervical length and shear wave elastography in women with spontaneous preterm birth.自发性早产妇女宫颈长度和剪切波弹性成像的纵向评估。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Jun;63(6):789-797. doi: 10.1002/uog.27614.
3
Effect of depth on shear-wave elastography estimated in the internal and external cervical os during pregnancy.孕期宫颈内口和外口深度对剪切波弹性成像评估的影响。
J Perinat Med. 2014 Sep;42(5):549-57. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2014-0073.
4
Evaluation of cervical stiffness during pregnancy using semiquantitative ultrasound elastography.应用半定量超声弹性成像技术评估妊娠期宫颈硬度。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Feb;41(2):152-61. doi: 10.1002/uog.12344. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
5
Cervical shear wave elastography as a predictor of preterm delivery during 18-24 weeks of pregnancy.孕18 - 24周期间,宫颈剪切波弹性成像作为早产的预测指标。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019 Nov;45(11):2158-2168. doi: 10.1111/jog.14094. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
6
Quantitative elastography of cervical stiffness during the three trimesters of pregnancy with a semiautomatic measurement program: A longitudinal prospective pilot study.使用半自动测量程序对妊娠三期宫颈硬度进行定量弹性成像:一项纵向前瞻性初步研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020 Feb;46(2):237-248. doi: 10.1111/jog.14170. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
7
Shear wave elastography: the relationship of the cervical stiffness with gestational age and cervical length- a feasibility study.剪切波弹性成像:宫颈硬度与孕周及宫颈长度的关系——一项可行性研究
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(25):9684-9693. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2022.2050896. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
8
A soft cervix, categorized by shear-wave elastography, in women with short or with normal cervical length at 18-24 weeks is associated with a higher prevalence of spontaneous preterm delivery.在孕18至24周时,经剪切波弹性成像分类为宫颈柔软的女性,无论宫颈长度短或正常,其自发性早产的患病率都较高。
J Perinat Med. 2018 Jul 26;46(5):489-501. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2018-0062.
9
Intra- and inter-observer variability of evaluation of uterine cervix elastography images during pregnancy.孕期子宫颈弹性成像图像评估的观察者内及观察者间变异性
Ginekol Pol. 2014 May;85(5):360-4. doi: 10.17772/gp/1740.
10
Quantification of cervical elastography: a reproducibility study.宫颈弹性成像定量分析:一项可重复性研究。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jun;39(6):685-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.11067. Epub 2012 May 22.

引用本文的文献

1
The Emerging Role of Sonoelastography in Pregnancy: Applications in Assessing Maternal and Fetal Health.超声弹性成像在孕期的新作用:在评估母婴健康中的应用
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Dec 28;15(1):47. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15010047.
2
Clinical experience with shear wave elastography (SWE) for assessing healthy uterus in a transabdominal approach.经腹途径评估健康子宫的剪切波弹性成像(SWE)的临床经验。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 24;14(1):14473. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65238-3.
3
Predictive Value of Cervical Shear Wave Elastography in the Induction of Labor in Late-Term Pregnancy Nulliparous Women: Preliminary Results.
宫颈剪切波弹性成像在晚期妊娠初产妇引产中的预测价值:初步结果
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 May 18;13(10):1782. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13101782.
4
Advances in the clinical application of ultrasound elastography in uterine imaging.超声弹性成像在子宫成像临床应用中的进展
Insights Imaging. 2022 Sep 4;13(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s13244-022-01274-9.
5
Clinical application of cervical shear wave elastography in predicting the risk of preterm delivery in DCDA twin pregnancy.宫颈剪切波弹性成像在预测双绒毛膜双羊膜囊双胎妊娠早产风险中的临床应用
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Mar 14;22(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04526-0.