• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[精神病学中的非自愿拘留和隔离措施:我们现在处于什么情况?卢瓦尔河谷地区中心2012 - 2017年研究]

[Involuntary detention and seclusion measures in psychiatry: Where are we now? A regional Centre-Val de Loire 2012-2017 study].

作者信息

Laurent O, Godillon L, Biotteau M, Baron S, Grammatico-Guillon L, Laurent E

机构信息

Département d'information médicale (DIM), CH George-Sand, 77, rue Louis-Mallet, 18024 Bourges cedex, France; Laboratoire de santé publique, faculté de médecine, université de Tours, 10, boulevard Tonnellé, 37000 Tours, France.

Laboratoire de santé publique, faculté de médecine, université de Tours, 10, boulevard Tonnellé, 37000 Tours, France; Épidémiologie des données cliniques en Centre-Val de Loire (EpiDcliC), CHRU de Tours, 2, boulevard Tonnellé, 37000 Tours, France.

出版信息

Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2020 Jun;68(3):155-161. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2020.02.001. Epub 2020 Apr 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.respe.2020.02.001
PMID:32312484
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The French legal framework in psychiatry for involuntary detention (ID) and seclusion measures was modified in 2011 and 2016, respectively. This study aimed to describe the evolution of ID and seclusion measures in the Centre-Val de Loire region (CVL France) between 2012 and 2017, using the psychiatric hospital discharge database.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted, including adult patients (≥ 18 years old) from CVL hospitalized in psychiatry or included in a care program (outpatient care) between 2012 and 2017. Hospital stays for each patient were identified by an anonymized number.

RESULTS

In 2017 in CVL, 13,942 patients were hospitalised for psychiatric reasons, with 2378 in ID (17%), a proportion that has remained stable since 2012. Among them, 3% were in care due to imminent danger (+ 54% since 2013, stabilisation since 2016), and 11% were hospitalized following a third party request (-13%). However, regarding location results varied from one department to the next. Seclusion measures involved 10% of full-time patients (stable), 27% of ID patients and 3% of those under voluntary care (stable). One quarter of the secluded patients were in voluntary care. Mean seclusion duration was 12 days, consecutive or not, and somewhat less for patients in voluntary care alone (10 days).

CONCLUSION

The region wide ID rate and average duration of seclusion were lower than the nationwide rate (24% in full-time ID in 2015; 15 days of seclusion/patient), whereas the number of imminent danger procedures increased, as did the persistence of seclusion measures for patients in voluntary care (recommended only as a last resort and/or for ID patients). These results should lead to renewed assessment of care center practices. The French psychiatric hospital discharge database has several limitations, including lack of financial incentive and highly complex structuration. However, since 2018 new data regarding seclusion and restraint measures have been added to the existing registry, and they should facilitate more accurate analyses, particularly as concerns restraint.

摘要

背景

法国精神病学中关于非自愿住院(ID)和隔离措施的法律框架分别于2011年和2016年进行了修订。本研究旨在利用精神病医院出院数据库描述2012年至2017年期间法国卢瓦尔河谷中心地区(CVL)ID和隔离措施的演变情况。

方法

进行了一项横断面研究,纳入2012年至2017年期间在CVL因精神疾病住院或纳入护理项目(门诊护理)的成年患者(≥18岁)。通过匿名编号识别每位患者的住院情况。

结果

2017年在CVL,有13942名患者因精神疾病住院,其中2378名接受非自愿住院治疗(占17%),这一比例自2012年以来一直保持稳定。其中,3%的患者因迫在眉睫的危险而接受治疗(自2013年以来增加了54%,自2016年以来趋于稳定),11%的患者应第三方要求住院治疗(下降了13%)。然而,各部门的住院地点结果有所不同。隔离措施涉及10%的全日制患者(稳定)、27%的非自愿住院患者和3%的自愿护理患者(稳定)。四分之一的被隔离患者接受自愿护理。平均隔离时间为1天,连续或不连续,仅接受自愿护理的患者隔离时间略短(10天)。

结论

该地区的非自愿住院率和平均隔离时间低于全国水平(2015年全日制非自愿住院率为24%;每位患者隔离15天),而因迫在眉睫的危险而进行的治疗程序数量增加,自愿护理患者的隔离措施持续时间也增加(仅建议作为最后手段和/或针对非自愿住院患者)。这些结果应促使对护理中心的做法进行重新评估。法国精神病医院出院数据库有几个局限性,包括缺乏经济激励和结构高度复杂。然而,自2018年以来,关于隔离和约束措施的新数据已被添加到现有登记册中,它们应有助于进行更准确的分析,特别是在约束方面。

相似文献

1
[Involuntary detention and seclusion measures in psychiatry: Where are we now? A regional Centre-Val de Loire 2012-2017 study].[精神病学中的非自愿拘留和隔离措施:我们现在处于什么情况?卢瓦尔河谷地区中心2012 - 2017年研究]
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2020 Jun;68(3):155-161. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2020.02.001. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
2
[Duration of seclusion and exit of the seclusion room, study of the impact of anamnestic and institutional factors].[隔离时长与隔离室出院情况,既往史及机构因素影响的研究]
Encephale. 2020 Jun;46(3):184-189. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2019.10.005. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
3
[Predictive factors of seclusion duration in patients hospitalized in psychiatry settings. A prospective multisite study in the DTRF Paris-Sud].[精神科住院患者隔离时间的预测因素。巴黎南部地区 DTRF 的一项前瞻性多中心研究]
Encephale. 2019 Apr;45(2):107-113. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2018.01.005. Epub 2018 Mar 24.
4
The use of coercive measures in adolescent psychiatric inpatient treatment: a nation-wide register study.在青少年精神病住院治疗中使用强制手段:一项全国性登记研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2012 Sep;47(9):1401-8. doi: 10.1007/s00127-011-0456-7. Epub 2011 Nov 24.
5
Seclusion, restraint, and involuntary medication in Finnish psychiatric care: a register study with root-level data.芬兰精神科护理中的隔离、约束和非自愿用药:一项基于根源层面数据的登记研究
Nord J Psychiatry. 2020 Aug;74(6):439-443. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2020.1733658. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
6
Prevalence and correlates of seclusion with or without restraint in a Canadian psychiatric hospital: a 2-year retrospective audit.在加拿大一家精神病院,单独隔离和(或)约束的流行情况及其相关因素:一项为期 2 年的回顾性审计。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2011 Jun;18(5):394-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2010.01679.x. Epub 2011 Jan 4.
7
Influence of patient characteristics on duration of seclusion/restrain in acute psychiatric settings in Japan.日本急性精神科环境中患者特征对隔离/约束时间的影响。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2013 Sep;67(6):405-11. doi: 10.1111/pcn.12078. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
8
The reasons for using restraint and seclusion in psychiatric inpatient care: A nationwide 15-year study.精神科住院护理中使用约束和隔离的原因:一项为期15年的全国性研究。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2010 Apr;64(2):136-44. doi: 10.3109/08039480903274449.
9
Seclusion, Restraint, Therapeutic Alliance, and Legal Admission Status: What Really Matters?隔离、约束、治疗联盟和合法入院状态:什么才是真正重要的?
J Psychiatr Pract. 2022 Nov 1;28(6):454-464. doi: 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000665.
10
Incidence of seclusion and restraint in psychiatric hospitals: a literature review and survey of international trends.精神病医院中隔离和约束措施的发生率:文献综述及国际趋势调查
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2010 Sep;45(9):889-97. doi: 10.1007/s00127-009-0132-3. Epub 2009 Sep 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics and correlates of seclusion and mechanical restraint measures in a Parisian psychiatric hospital group.巴黎一家精神病医院集团中隔离与机械约束措施的特征及相关因素
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Feb 19;15:1296356. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1296356. eCollection 2024.