• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国首尔地铁客流量对新冠疫情的响应变化:对社交距离的启示

Changes in Subway Ridership in Response to COVID-19 in Seoul, South Korea: Implications for Social Distancing.

作者信息

Park Jewel

机构信息

College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, KOR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2020 Apr 14;12(4):e7668. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7668.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.7668
PMID:32313784
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7163336/
Abstract

Introduction While numerous episodes of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and subsequent government announcements in South Korea were accompanied by widespread social distancing efforts by the people, it is unclear whether these episodes and government announcements were actually influential in improving social distancing, or whether the level of response among different demographic groups varied. Methods Data were downloaded from Seoul Data Open Plaza, and changes in the number of passengers on the Seoul Metropolitan Subway network between January 1, 2020, and March 31, 2020, were used to assess the extent to which people in Seoul practiced social distancing. Five events regarding COVID-19 that received wide public attention between January and March 2020 were identified and the changes in the number of passengers before and after each event were analyzed. Also, similar analyses were performed for 16 stations that were specific in either the age or purpose of the visit of the passengers. Results Compared to the third week of January 2020 (January 13-19), the mean daily number of passengers in all stations decreased by 2,984,857.4 or 40.6% by the first week of March (March 2-8). The percentage decrease in individual stations between this period was not significantly different between "young" and "old" stations (46.3% vs. 49.2%; p = 0.551) but was significantly smaller in "work" stations than in "leisure" stations (36.2% vs. 51.6%; p = 0.021). Of the five events, the first reported death due to COVID-19 in South Korea and the identification of a mass infection cluster in Daegu on February 20 were accompanied by the greatest decrease of the mean daily number of passengers (1,352,153.3 or 20.8%), while the first mass infection in Seoul on March 10 and the announcement of aggressive social distancing campaign on March 22 were accompanied by an increase in the number of passengers. Conclusions The number of subway passengers in Seoul decreased markedly during late February but slowly increased afterward, suggesting decreasing levels of risk perception and adherence to social distancing. Understanding the differing patterns of subway use by age or purpose of the visit may guide policymakers and the general public in shaping their future response to the current pandemic.

摘要

引言 虽然韩国2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)感染的众多事件以及随后的政府公告都伴随着民众广泛的社交距离措施,但尚不清楚这些事件和政府公告是否真的对改善社交距离有影响,或者不同人口群体的反应程度是否存在差异。方法 数据从首尔数据开放广场下载,利用2020年1月1日至2020年3月31日首尔地铁网络上乘客数量的变化来评估首尔民众践行社交距离的程度。确定了2020年1月至3月期间受到广泛公众关注的五起关于COVID-19的事件,并分析了每起事件前后乘客数量的变化。此外,还对16个在乘客年龄或出行目的方面具有特殊性的站点进行了类似分析。结果 与2020年1月的第三周(1月13日至19日)相比,到3月的第一周(3月2日至8日),所有站点的日均乘客数量减少了2,984,857.4人,降幅为40.6%。在此期间,“年轻”站点和“老年”站点之间单个站点的降幅没有显著差异(46.3%对49.2%;p = 0.551),但“工作”站点的降幅明显小于“休闲”站点(36.2%对51.6%;p = 0.021)。在这五起事件中,韩国首次报告的COVID-19死亡病例以及2月20日大邱市大规模感染集群的发现伴随着日均乘客数量的最大降幅(减少1,352,153.3人,降幅为20.8%),而3月10日首尔首次出现大规模感染以及3月22日宣布积极的社交距离措施时,乘客数量却有所增加。结论 首尔地铁乘客数量在2月下旬显著下降,但随后缓慢上升,这表明风险认知和对社交距离的遵守程度在降低。了解按年龄或出行目的划分的地铁使用不同模式,可能会指导政策制定者和公众制定未来应对当前疫情的措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0f3/7163336/de3bd8f5cb11/cureus-0012-00000007668-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0f3/7163336/404a83106918/cureus-0012-00000007668-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0f3/7163336/d3cbcd9ef17c/cureus-0012-00000007668-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0f3/7163336/de3bd8f5cb11/cureus-0012-00000007668-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0f3/7163336/404a83106918/cureus-0012-00000007668-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0f3/7163336/d3cbcd9ef17c/cureus-0012-00000007668-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0f3/7163336/de3bd8f5cb11/cureus-0012-00000007668-i03.jpg

相似文献

1
Changes in Subway Ridership in Response to COVID-19 in Seoul, South Korea: Implications for Social Distancing.韩国首尔地铁客流量对新冠疫情的响应变化:对社交距离的启示
Cureus. 2020 Apr 14;12(4):e7668. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7668.
2
The Unequal Effects of Social Distancing Policy on Subway Ridership during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Seoul, South Korea.《韩国首尔新冠疫情期间社交隔离政策对地铁客流量的不平等影响》。
J Urban Health. 2022 Feb;99(1):77-81. doi: 10.1007/s11524-021-00585-4. Epub 2022 Jan 1.
3
Station-Level Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Subway Ridership in the Seoul Metropolitan Area.新冠疫情对首尔大都市区地铁客流量的站点层面影响
Transp Res Rec. 2023 Apr;2677(4):802-812. doi: 10.1177/03611981221096665. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
4
Social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic: Potential impact and correlation with asthma.COVID-19 大流行期间的社交隔离:潜在影响及其与哮喘的相关性。
Heart Lung. 2024 Nov-Dec;68:18-22. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2024.06.002. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
5
Types of COVID-19 clusters and their relationship with social distancing in the Seoul metropolitan area, South Korea.韩国首尔大都市地区的 COVID-19 集群类型及其与社交距离的关系。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 May;106:363-369. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.058. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
6
Improving the subway attraction for the post-COVID-19 era: The role of fare-free public transport policy.提升后疫情时代地铁吸引力:免费公共交通政策的作用。
Transp Policy (Oxf). 2021 Mar;103:21-30. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.01.007. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
7
Viability of compact cities in the post-COVID-19 era: subway ridership variations in Seoul Korea.新冠疫情后时代紧凑型城市的可行性:韩国首尔地铁客流量变化
Ann Reg Sci. 2022 Mar 7:1-29. doi: 10.1007/s00168-022-01119-9.
8
Life Expectancy in Areas around Subway Stations in the Seoul Metropolitan Area in Korea, 2008-2017.韩国首尔大都市圈地铁站周边地区的预期寿命,2008-2017 年。
J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Nov 16;35(44):e365. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e365.
9
[Distribution of airborne fungi, particulate matter and carbon dioxide in Seoul metropolitan subway stations].[首尔地铁车站空气中真菌、颗粒物及二氧化碳的分布情况]
J Prev Med Public Health. 2006 Jul;39(4):325-30.
10
COVID-19: Were Public Health Interventions and the Disclosure of Patients' Contact History Effective in Upholding Social Distancing? Evidence from South Korea.新型冠状病毒肺炎:公共卫生干预措施及患者接触史披露在维护社交距离方面是否有效?来自韩国的证据。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Mar 22;14:705-712. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S303093. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the quality of the public transport service during the COVID-19 pandemic from the perception of two user groups.从两个用户群体的认知角度评估新冠疫情期间公共交通服务的质量。
Eur Transp Res Rev. 2023;15(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12544-023-00578-1. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
2
Consumer responses towards essential purchases during COVID-19 pan-India lockdown.新冠疫情全印度封锁期间消费者对必需品购买的反应。
Res Transp Bus Manag. 2022 Jun;43:100768. doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2021.100768. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
3
Systematic literature review on impacts of COVID-19 pandemic and corresponding measures on mobility.

本文引用的文献

1
Potential Role of Social Distancing in Mitigating Spread of Coronavirus Disease, South Korea.社交隔离在减缓韩国冠状病毒疾病传播中的潜在作用。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Nov;26(11):2697-2700. doi: 10.3201/eid2611.201099. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
2
Coronavirus Disease-19: The First 7,755 Cases in the Republic of Korea.新型冠状病毒肺炎:韩国首批7755例病例
Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2020 Apr;11(2):85-90. doi: 10.24171/j.phrp.2020.11.2.05.
3
Why inequality could spread COVID-19.为何不平等会传播新冠病毒。
关于新冠疫情及其相应措施对流动性影响的系统文献综述。
Transportation (Amst). 2023 Apr 25:1-55. doi: 10.1007/s11116-023-10392-2.
4
Social and spatial heterogeneities in COVID-19 impacts on individual's metro use: A big-data driven causality inference.新冠疫情对个人地铁出行影响的社会和空间异质性:基于大数据的因果推断
Appl Geogr. 2023 Jun;155:102947. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.102947. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
5
Understanding individual-level travel behavior changes due to COVID-19: Trip frequency, trip regularity, and trip distance.了解因新冠疫情导致的个人层面出行行为变化:出行频率、出行规律性和出行距离。
Cities. 2023 Apr;135:104223. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104223. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
6
Local travel behaviour under continuing COVID-19 waves- A proxy for pandemic fatigue?新冠疫情持续期间的本地出行行为——是大流行疲劳的一种表现吗?
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2023 Mar;18:100757. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2023.100757. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
7
Determining factors affecting public bike ridership and its spatial change before and after COVID-19.确定影响新冠疫情前后公共自行车出行率及其空间变化的因素。
Travel Behav Soc. 2023 Apr;31:24-36. doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2022.11.002. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
8
Examining the causal relationship between bike-share and public transit in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.研究新冠疫情期间共享单车与公共交通之间的因果关系。
Cities. 2022 Dec;131:104024. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104024. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
9
Increased Rate of Fracture Injuries Associated With Alternative Modes of Transportation During COVID-19.与 COVID-19 期间替代交通方式相关的骨折损伤发生率增加。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2022 Sep 27;6(9). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-22-00147. eCollection 2022 Sep 1.
10
Unraveling the dynamic impacts of COVID-19 on metro ridership: An empirical analysis of Beijing and Shanghai, China.揭示新冠疫情对地铁客流量的动态影响:基于中国北京和上海的实证分析
Transp Policy (Oxf). 2022 Oct;127:158-170. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.09.002. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
Lancet Public Health. 2020 May;5(5):e240. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30085-2. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
4
How behavioural science data helps mitigate the COVID-19 crisis.行为科学数据如何帮助缓解 COVID-19 危机。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 May;4(5):438. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0866-1.
5
Scientific and ethical basis for social-distancing interventions against COVID-19.针对COVID-19的社交距离干预措施的科学与伦理基础。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Jun;20(6):631-633. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30190-0. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
6
Covid-19: identifying and isolating asymptomatic people helped eliminate virus in Italian village.新冠疫情:识别并隔离无症状感染者助力意大利村庄消灭病毒。
BMJ. 2020 Mar 23;368:m1165. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1165.
7
Clinical features of COVID-19 in elderly patients: A comparison with young and middle-aged patients.老年 COVID-19 患者的临床特征:与中青年患者的比较。
J Infect. 2020 Jun;80(6):e14-e18. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.005. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
8
Risk perception and effectiveness of uncoordinated behavioral responses in an emerging epidemic.突发传染病中不协调行为反应的风险感知和有效性。
Math Biosci. 2012 Aug;238(2):80-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2012.04.003. Epub 2012 May 3.