The New York University Cardiac Electrophysiology Service, New York University School of Medicine, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Jul;31(7):1678-1686. doi: 10.1111/jce.14507. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
Catheter stability during atrial fibrillation ablation is associated with higher ablation success rates. Rapid cardiac pacing and high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) independently improve catheter stability. Simultaneous modulation of cardiac and respiratory motion has not been previously studied. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of simultaneous heart rate and respiratory rate modulation on catheter stability.
Forty patients undergoing paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation received ablation lesions at 15 prespecified locations (12 left atria, 3 right atria). Patients were randomly assigned to undergo rapid atrial pacing for either the first or the second half of each lesion. Within each group, half of the patients received HFJV and the other half standard ventilation. Contact force and ablation data for all lesions were compared among the study groups. Standard deviation of contact force was the primary endpoint defined to examine contact force variability.
Lesions with no pacing and standard ventilation had the greatest contact force standard deviation (5.86 ± 3.08 g), compared to lesions with pacing and standard ventilation (5.45 ± 3.28 g; P < .01) or to lesions with no pacing and HFJV (4.92 ± 3.00 g; P < .01). Lesions with both pacing and HFJV had the greatest reduction in contact force standard deviation (4.35 ± 2.81 g; P < .01), confirming an additive benefit of each maneuver. Pacing and HFJV together was also associated with a reduction in the proportion of lesions with excessive maximum contact force (P < .001).
Rapid pacing and HFJV additively improve catheter stability. Simultaneous pacing with HFJV further improves catheter stability over pacing or HFJV alone to optimize ablation lesions.
心房颤动消融过程中导管的稳定性与更高的消融成功率相关。快速心脏起搏和高频喷射通气(HFJV)均可独立改善导管稳定性。同时调节心脏和呼吸运动尚未被研究过。本研究的目的是确定同时调节心率和呼吸频率对导管稳定性的影响。
40 名接受阵发性心房颤动消融的患者在 15 个预定部位(12 个左心房,3 个右心房)接受消融损伤。患者被随机分为快速心房起搏组和对照组。在每组中,一半患者接受 HFJV,另一半患者接受标准通气。比较各组的所有病变的接触力和消融数据。接触力标准差被定义为主要终点,用于检查接触力的变异性。
无起搏和标准通气的病变接触力标准差最大(5.86±3.08g),与起搏和标准通气(5.45±3.28g;P<.01)或无起搏和 HFJV(4.92±3.00g;P<.01)的病变相比。同时起搏和 HFJV 的病变接触力标准差降低最大(4.35±2.81g;P<.01),证实了每个操作的附加益处。起搏和 HFJV 同时使用还与最大接触力过大的病变比例降低相关(P<.001)。
快速起搏和 HFJV 可附加改善导管稳定性。同时起搏和 HFJV 进一步改善导管稳定性,优于起搏或 HFJV 单独使用,以优化消融损伤。