Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil,
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.
Audiol Neurootol. 2020;25(6):309-314. doi: 10.1159/000506894. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
Noise-induced hearing loss is the most preventable cause of auditory impairment. Periodic audiometric evaluations are essential to monitor the hearing health of noise-exposed workers.
To compare the evolution of audiometric thresholds in the initial three evaluations at frequencies of 3, 4, and 6 kHz in groups of workers exposed or not to noise.
In this historical cohort study, audiometric evaluations were obtained from male workers between 18 and 40 years of age at six different metallurgical companies in Brazil. The workers were separated into noise-exposed and non-noise-exposed groups. The mean thresholds for 3, 4, and 6 kHz were calculated for both ears at baseline and the first and second periodic evaluations. The non-parametric Wilcoxon test was used for statistical analysis.
A total of 1,382 metallurgical workers were evaluated (1,199 noise-exposed and 183 non-noise-exposed). There was a significant difference between baseline and the first periodic evaluation (right ear - effect size = 0.62; p = 0.0030 and left ear - effect size = 0.74; p = 0.0063) and between baseline and the second periodic evaluation (right ear - effect size = 0.85; p = 0.004 and left ear - effect size = 0.96; p = 0.0002). In the non-noise-exposed group, there was no difference between baseline and the first periodic evaluation (right ear - effect size = 0.18; p = 0.2703 and left ear - effect size = 0.12; p = 0.7907) and between baseline and the second periodic evaluation (right ear - effect size = 0.29; p = 0.4475 and left ear - effect size = 0.41; p = 0.6381).
In noise-exposed workers, there was a significant worsening of audiometric thresholds between baseline and the initial periodic evaluation, but there was no difference between the two post-baseline evaluations. This shows that noise exposure can quickly affect hearing, despite protective measures.
噪声性听力损失是最可预防的听力损伤原因。定期进行听力评估对于监测噪声暴露工人的听力健康至关重要。
比较暴露和未暴露于噪声的工人在初始三次 3、4 和 6 kHz 频率听力阈值评估中的演变。
在这项历史性队列研究中,我们从巴西六家不同冶金公司的 18 至 40 岁男性工人中获得了听力评估结果。工人被分为噪声暴露组和非噪声暴露组。在基线和第一次及第二次定期评估时,计算双耳 3、4 和 6 kHz 的平均阈值。使用非参数 Wilcoxon 检验进行统计分析。
共评估了 1382 名冶金工人(1199 名噪声暴露工人和 183 名非噪声暴露工人)。基线与第一次定期评估(右耳 - 效应量 = 0.62;p = 0.0030 和左耳 - 效应量 = 0.74;p = 0.0063)以及基线与第二次定期评估(右耳 - 效应量 = 0.85;p = 0.004 和左耳 - 效应量 = 0.96;p = 0.0002)之间存在显著差异。在非噪声暴露组中,基线与第一次定期评估(右耳 - 效应量 = 0.18;p = 0.2703 和左耳 - 效应量 = 0.12;p = 0.7907)以及基线与第二次定期评估(右耳 - 效应量 = 0.29;p = 0.4475 和左耳 - 效应量 = 0.41;p = 0.6381)之间均无差异。
在噪声暴露工人中,在基线与初始定期评估之间,听力阈值显著恶化,但两次基线后评估之间没有差异。这表明尽管采取了保护措施,噪声暴露仍可能很快对听力产生影响。