• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

协作实践:批判性理论视角

Collaborative practice: a critical theory perspective.

作者信息

McLain B R

机构信息

Department of Family Health Care Nursing, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143.

出版信息

Res Nurs Health. 1988 Dec;11(6):391-8. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770110607.

DOI:10.1002/nur.4770110607
PMID:3231741
Abstract

The purpose of this critical theory study was to investigate the observed failure of nurses and physicians to collaborate, and the underlying meaning behind this failure. Using a phenomenological and participatory approach, 18 family nurse practitioners and physicians in joint practice were interviewed separately and together about their practice relationships. Transcribed interviews and data summaries were returned to the participants for review and validation. Emergent themes were analyzed using the critical theory of Jürgen Habermas. Results demonstrated that distorted communication and nonmeaningful interactions were promoted by both nurses and physicians. Elements identified as contributing to more successful collaborative practices included a willingness to move beyond basic information exchange in nurse/physician interactions, the willingness and ability to challenge distortions and assumptions in the relationship, and a belief system based on critical self-reflection.

摘要

这项批判性理论研究的目的是调查观察到的护士与医生之间协作失败的情况,以及这种失败背后的潜在意义。采用现象学和参与式方法,分别对18名联合执业的家庭护士从业者和医生进行了单独访谈和共同访谈,了解他们的执业关系。访谈记录和数据摘要返回给参与者进行审查和验证。使用尤尔根·哈贝马斯的批判性理论对浮现出的主题进行分析。结果表明,护士和医生都助长了沟通扭曲和无意义的互动。被确定为有助于更成功协作实践的因素包括:愿意超越护士/医生互动中的基本信息交流,愿意并有能力挑战关系中的扭曲和假设,以及基于批判性自我反思的信仰体系。

相似文献

1
Collaborative practice: a critical theory perspective.协作实践:批判性理论视角
Res Nurs Health. 1988 Dec;11(6):391-8. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770110607.
2
Collaborative practice: the nurse practitioner's role in its success or failure.协作实践:执业护士在其成败中所扮演的角色。
Nurse Pract. 1988 May;13(5):31-5, 38.
3
Experiences of nurse practitioners and medical practitioners working in collaborative practice models in primary healthcare in Australia - a multiple case study using mixed methods.澳大利亚初级医疗保健中从事协作实践模式的执业护士和执业医生的经验——一项采用混合方法的多案例研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Jul 29;17:99. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0503-2.
4
The advanced practice professionals' perspective: keys to a good working relationship between advanced practice professions and physicians.高级实践专业人员的观点:高级实践专业与医生之间良好工作关系的关键。
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2013. doi: 10.1200/EdBook_AM.2013.33.e375.
5
A reflection of the coding of meaning in patient-physician interaction: Jürgen Habermas' theory of communication applied to sequence analysis.医患互动中意义编码的一种反映:尤尔根·哈贝马斯的沟通理论在序列分析中的应用。
Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Aug;54(2):245-8. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(04)00221-6.
6
The advanced practice nurse in collaborative practice.协作实践中的高级执业护士。
Nursingconnections. 1996 Spring;9(1):5-16.
7
Family physicians' perspectives on interprofessional teamwork: Findings from a qualitative study.家庭医生对跨专业团队合作的看法:一项定性研究的结果
J Interprof Care. 2018 Mar;32(2):169-177. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2017.1395828. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
8
Collaborative care between nurse practitioners and primary care physicians.执业护士与初级保健医生之间的协作护理。
Prim Care. 1996 Mar;23(1):103-13. doi: 10.1016/s0095-4543(05)70264-5.
9
Components necessary in a successful nurse practitioner-physician collaborative practice.成功的执业护士-医生协作实践中所需的要素。
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 1990 Apr-Jun;2(2):54-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.1990.tb00776.x.
10
Defining the NP role.定义执业护士的角色。
Nurse Pract. 1996 Apr;21(4):8, 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Care of elderly people by the general practitioner and the geriatrician in Belgium: a qualitative study of their relationship.比利时全科医生和老年病医生对老年人的护理:对他们关系的定性研究。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2012;5:17-25. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S27617. Epub 2012 Jan 25.