• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运动发育量表(MDS)的结构效度。

Construct validity of the Motor Development Scale (MDS).

机构信息

Departamento de Psiquiatria e Psicologia Médica, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Department of Educational and Psychology, Division of Methods and Evaluation, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2020 Jan-Mar;42(1):82-85. doi: 10.1590/2237-6089-2018-0114.

DOI:10.1590/2237-6089-2018-0114
PMID:32321087
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Construct validity for the Motor Development Scale (MDS) has not been established. The aim of this study was to examine whether the unidimensional model of MDS would be appropriate for children aged 4 to 6 years-old and provide construct validity for the items concerning this age group in Brazil.

METHODS

A total of 938 children participated in the study (214 4-year-olds, 643 5-year-olds, and 81 6-year-olds). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to evaluate construct validity of the MDS using a unidimensional model.

RESULTS

The CFA for the unidimensional model showed excellent adequacy indices for age 4: χ2(2) = 0.581, p = 0.748, comparative fit index (CFI) = 1.000, Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = 1.090, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.000 (90% confidence interval [90%CI] = 0.000 to 0.093, close fit [Cfit] = 0.841); age 5: χ2(2) = 2.669, p = 0.263, CFI = 0.993, TLI = 0.980, RMSEA = 0.023 (90%CI = 0.000 to 0.085, Cfit = 0.682), weighted root mean square residual (WRMR) = 0.407; and age 6: χ2(9) = 8.275, p = 0.506, CFI = 1.000, TLI = 1.010, RMSEA = 0.000 (90%CI = 0.000 to 0.118, Cfit = 0.653), WRMR = 0.495. Reliability was good: ω = 0.87 (95%CI = 0.81 to 0.92).

CONCLUSION

The proposed unidimensional solution for the MDS provides a concise, parsimonious and reliable way to assess motor development in children aged 4 to 6 years.

摘要

目的

运动发育量表(MDS)的建构效度尚未确定。本研究的目的是检验 MDS 的单维模型是否适用于 4 至 6 岁儿童,并为巴西该年龄段的项目提供建构效度。

方法

共有 938 名儿童参与了研究(214 名 4 岁儿童,643 名 5 岁儿童,81 名 6 岁儿童)。使用验证性因子分析(CFA)来评估 MDS 的单维模型的建构效度。

结果

4 岁儿童的单维模型 CFA 显示出极好的充分性指标:χ2(2)= 0.581,p = 0.748,比较拟合指数(CFI)= 1.000,Tucker-Lewis 指数(TLI)= 1.090,近似均方根误差(RMSEA)= 0.000(90%置信区间 [90%CI] = 0.000 至 0.093,接近拟合 [Cfit] = 0.841);5 岁儿童:χ2(2)= 2.669,p = 0.263,CFI = 0.993,TLI = 0.980,RMSEA = 0.023(90%CI = 0.000 至 0.085,Cfit = 0.682),加权均方根残差(WRMR)= 0.407;6 岁儿童:χ2(9)= 8.275,p = 0.506,CFI = 1.000,TLI = 1.010,RMSEA = 0.000(90%CI = 0.000 至 0.118,Cfit = 0.653),WRMR = 0.495。信度良好:ω = 0.87(95%CI = 0.81 至 0.92)。

结论

提出的 MDS 单维解决方案为 4 至 6 岁儿童的运动发育评估提供了一种简洁、简约和可靠的方法。

相似文献

1
Construct validity of the Motor Development Scale (MDS).运动发育量表(MDS)的结构效度。
Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2020 Jan-Mar;42(1):82-85. doi: 10.1590/2237-6089-2018-0114.
2
Validity and reliability of the TGMD-2 for Brazilian children.适用于巴西儿童的TGMD - 2的效度和信度。
J Mot Behav. 2012;44(4):275-80. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2012.700967. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
3
The development of a short form of the Test of Gross Motor Development-2 in Brazilian children: Validity and reliability.巴西儿童粗大运动发育测试 -2 简版的编制:效度与信度
Child Care Health Dev. 2018 Sep;44(5):759-765. doi: 10.1111/cch.12598. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
4
[Assessment on the validity and reliability of Family Environment Scale on Motor Development for Urban Pre-school Children].[城市学龄前儿童家庭环境量表对运动发育的效度与信度评估]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2012 May;33(5):464-9.
5
Validity and reliability of the ten-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC10) instrument in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in Singapore.新加坡轴向型脊柱关节炎(axSpA)患者的Connor-Davidson 韧性量表(CD-RISC10)十项量表的有效性和可靠性。
Rheumatol Int. 2019 Jan;39(1):105-110. doi: 10.1007/s00296-018-4217-8. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
6
Subjective wellbeing of preschool children.学龄前儿童的主观幸福感。
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 20;11:1156755. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1156755. eCollection 2023.
7
Severity of temporomandibular disorders in women: validity and reliability of the Fonseca Anamnestic Index.女性颞下颌关节紊乱严重程度:Fonseca 病史指数的效度和信度。
Braz Oral Res. 2014;28:16-21. doi: 10.1590/s1806-83242013005000026.
8
A Brief Measure for the Assessment of Competence in Coping With Death: The Coping With Death Scale Short Version.应对死亡能力评估的简要测量工具:应对死亡量表简短版。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Feb;57(2):209-215. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.11.003. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
9
Validation of the Dutch-Flemish PROMIS Pain Interference Item Bank in Patients With Musculoskeletal Complaints.荷兰-佛兰芒 PROMIS 疼痛干扰项目库在肌肉骨骼疾病患者中的验证。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Mar 15;44(6):411-419. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002847.
10
The psychometric properties of PHQ-4 anxiety and depression screening scale among out of school adolescent girls and young women in Tanzania: a cross-sectional study.坦桑尼亚失学青少年女孩和年轻女性中 PHQ-4 焦虑和抑郁筛查量表的心理测量特性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 19;20(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02735-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Neurodevelopmental Outcomes among Brazilian Children with Cyanotic Congenital Heart Disease and Its Associated Factors.巴西患有紫绀型先天性心脏病儿童的神经发育结局及其相关因素。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Nov 18;58(11):1669. doi: 10.3390/medicina58111669.